Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NYSE:NLY) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 56% of the Company
Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NYSE:NLY) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 56% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Annaly Capital Management implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 43% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在安纳利资本管理的 substantial holdings 意味着他们对公司股票价格有重要影响
- 前25名股东拥有公司43%的股份。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
Every investor in Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NYSE:NLY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 56% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
安纳利资本管理公司(纽交所:NLY)每位投资者都应了解最强大的股东群体。机构持有56%的股份,拥有公司最大数量的股票。换句话说,机构面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Annaly Capital Management, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地探讨Annaly Capital Management的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Annaly Capital Management?
机构持股告诉我们关于Annaly Capital Management什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Annaly Capital Management does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Annaly Capital Management, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,Annaly Capital Management确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的相当一部分。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好还是对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证有所警惕。他们有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看Annaly Capital Management过去的盈利轨迹(见下文)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Annaly Capital Management is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.7% and 4.7% of the stock.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司,因此他们可以共同发挥重要的影响力。Annaly资本管理公司并不被对冲基金持有。黑岩公司(BlackRock, Inc.)目前是公司最大股东,持有10%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约8.7%和4.7%的股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Annaly Capital Management
Annaly资本管理公司的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that Annaly Capital Management, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$17m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们的信息显示,安纳利资本管理公司内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大型公司,我们只期望内部人士持有小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值1700万美元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股票是件好事,但检查这些内部人士是否有在买入是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Annaly Capital Management. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有安纳利资本管理44%的股份。虽然这一股份比例相当可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不同,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Annaly Capital Management (at least 2 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑不同的股东群体是值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。比如,投资风险始终存在。我们已经识别出安纳利资本管理的三个警告信号(至少有两个不应被忽视),理解这些信号应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。