With 79% Ownership in DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 79% Ownership in DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DraftKings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 考虑到机构在股票中持有大量股份,DraftKings的股价可能会受到它们交易决定的影响
- 业务的51%由前24名股东持有
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 79% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看DraftKings Inc.(纳斯达克:DKNG)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。 机构持有公司最大股份的79%。 也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者如果出现下行,则损失最大)。
Last week's 4.2% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 27%.
上周的涨幅为4.2%,意味着机构投资者处于正面区域,即使公司展现出强劲的长期趋势。上周的收益还将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为27%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DraftKings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究draftkings的每一类股东,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DraftKings?
机构持股告诉我们有关draftkings的什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
DraftKings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DraftKings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
draftkings已经在股东名册上拥有机构投资者。事实上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,依赖于机构投资者所谓的验证是最好持谨慎态度的。他们也有时犯错。当多家机构拥有一支股票时,总会存在他们进行'拥挤交易'的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看draftkings的历史收益和营业收入,但谨记故事还有更多内容。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DraftKings. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.7%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.4% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Jason Robins directly holds 0.5% of the total shares outstanding.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对DraftKings而言,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,拥有8.7%的所有权。与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的6.4%和4.7%。此外,公司的CEO杰森·罗宾斯直接持有总已发行股份的0.5%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记册,我们可以看到前24位股东控制了51%的股份,这意味着没有任何单一股东在所有权中拥有多数权益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of DraftKings
draftkings 内部财产所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in DraftKings Inc.. Insiders own US$460m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的最新数据显示,内部人员拥有DraftKings股票。 内部人员持有价值46000万美元的股份(按目前价格计算)。 大多数人会认为这表明股东与董事会之间存在良好的利益一致性。 不过,也许值得检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司拥有19%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能决定大局,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with DraftKings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
尽管考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,永远存在的投资风险。我们已经发现了draftkings的1个警告信号,理解它们应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。