Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Synopsys, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SNPS) Latest 5.9% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Synopsys, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SNPS) Latest 5.9% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Synopsys implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在新思科技的重大持股意味着他们对公司股价有重要影响
- 共有19位投资者拥有该公司51%的所有权
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ:SNPS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 89% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制新思科技公司(纳斯达克:SNPS),那么你需要查看其股东名册的构成。我们可以看到,机构在公司的持股比例高达89%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最大的收益(或者在下跌时损失最多)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 5.9% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 3.5% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Synopsys, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
机构投资者在公司股价上周下跌5.9%后遭受了最高的损失。这次损失使股东的年度损失增加到3.5%,这对这一类投资者来说可能并不好。机构通常被称为“市场推动者”,它们在影响任何股票的价格动态方面拥有显著的权力。因此,如果下跌趋势持续,机构可能面临卖出新思科技的压力,这可能对个别投资者产生负面影响。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Synopsys.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于新思科技的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Synopsys?
机构持股情况告诉我们关于新思科技什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Synopsys already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Synopsys, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
新思科技已经在股份登记上有了机构。事实上,他们在公司中持有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经关注了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看新思科技过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(如下所示)。当然,还要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Synopsys is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.6% and 4.8% of the stock.
投资者应该注意到,机构实际上拥有公司的超过一半,因此他们可以共同发挥显著的影响力。新思科技并不被对冲基金拥有。目前,先锋集团是最大的股东,持有9.3%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约8.6%和4.8%的股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔细地看我们的所有权数据表明,前19名股东持有的股份总共占51%,这意味着没有单个股东具有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Synopsys
新思科技的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Synopsys, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$530m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有新思科技不到1%的股份。由于这是一家大公司,我们只会预期内部人士拥有一个小的百分比。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值53000万美元的股份。在这种情况下,观察这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出更为有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Synopsys. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众通常持有10%的股份,主要由个体投资者组成,他们在新思科技拥有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种Ownership相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Synopsys better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑公司中拥有股份的不同群体总是值得思考的。但要更好地理解新思科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。