We Think City Developments (SGX:C09) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think City Developments (SGX:C09) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有人说,波动性,而不是债务,是投资者思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾说过一句名言:“波动性远非风险的代名词。”当你检查公司的资产负债表的风险时,考虑它的资产负债表是很自然的,因为企业倒闭时通常会涉及债务。我们可以看到,城市发展有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:C09)确实在其业务中使用了债务。但是这笔债务是股东关心的问题吗?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
债务带来什么风险?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务可以帮助企业,直到企业难以偿还债务,无论是新资本还是自由现金流。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能会一无所获。但是,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司为了控制债务,必须以低廉的股价稀释股东。但是,通过取代稀释,对于需要资本以高回报率投资增长的企业来说,债务可以成为一个非常好的工具。考虑公司的债务水平的第一步是同时考虑其现金和债务。
What Is City Developments's Net Debt?
城市开发的净负债是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 City Developments had debt of S$12.1b, up from S$10.3b in one year. On the flip side, it has S$1.94b in cash leading to net debt of about S$10.2b.
您可以点击下图查看更多详情,该图片显示,截至2024年6月,城市开发公司的债务为121亿新元,高于一年内的103亿新元。另一方面,它拥有19.4亿新元的现金,净负债约为102亿新元。
How Strong Is City Developments' Balance Sheet?
城市发展的资产负债表有多强?
According to the last reported balance sheet, City Developments had liabilities of S$4.71b due within 12 months, and liabilities of S$10.4b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of S$1.94b as well as receivables valued at S$2.42b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by S$10.7b.
根据上次报告的资产负债表,城市开发公司的负债为47.1亿新元,12个月后到期的负债为104亿新元。除这些债务外,它有19.4亿新元的现金以及价值24.2亿新元的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总额107亿新元。
The deficiency here weighs heavily on the S$4.73b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, City Developments would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
这里的缺陷严重影响了这家价值47.3亿新元的公司本身,就好像一个孩子在装满书本、运动装备和喇叭的巨大背包的重压下挣扎一样。因此,毫无疑问,我们将密切关注其资产负债表。归根结底,如果债权人要求还款,城市发展可能需要进行大规模的资本重组。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们使用两个主要比率来告知我们债务水平与收益的关系。第一个是净负债除以扣除利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),第二个是其利息和税前收益(EBIT)抵消利息支出(或简称利息保障)的多少倍。这种方法的优势在于,我们既考虑了债务的绝对数量(净负债占息税折旧摊销前利润),也考虑了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(及其利息覆盖率)。
Weak interest cover of 1.2 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 13.6 hit our confidence in City Developments like a one-two punch to the gut. The debt burden here is substantial. On the other hand, City Developments grew its EBIT by 26% in the last year. If it can maintain that kind of improvement, its debt load will begin to melt away like glaciers in a warming world. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if City Developments can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
1.2倍的薄弱利息覆盖率和令人不安的高净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润比率13.6打击了我们对城市发展的信心,就像是一二的冲击。这里的债务负担是沉重的。另一方面,城市发展公司的息税前利润在去年增长了26%。如果它能够保持这种改善,那么在变暖的世界中,其债务负担将像冰川一样开始消失。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定城市发展能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, City Developments actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.
最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法减少债务。因此,我们显然需要研究该息税前利润是否会带来相应的自由现金流。在过去的三年中,城市发展产生的自由现金流实际上超过了息税前利润。这种强劲的现金产生像穿着大黄蜂套装的小狗一样温暖着我们的心。
Our View
我们的观点
To be frank both City Developments's interest cover and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making City Developments stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for City Developments (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.
坦率地说,City Developments的利息保障及其保持总负债水平的往绩都使我们对债务水平感到相当不舒服。但至少在将息税前利润转换为自由现金流方面相当不错;这令人鼓舞。从资产负债表来看,考虑到所有这些因素,我们确实认为债务使城市开发公司的股票有点风险。有些人喜欢这种风险,但我们注意到了潜在的陷阱,因此我们可能更希望它承担较少的债务。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但是,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中,远非如此。这些风险可能很难发现。每家公司都有,我们发现了 2 个城市发展警告标志(其中 1 个很重要!)你应该知道。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
当然,如果你是那种喜欢在没有债务负担的情况下购买股票的投资者,那么请立即查看我们的独家净现金增长股票清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。