Institutional Shareholders May Be Less Affected by Flowers Foods, Inc.'s (NYSE:FLO) Pullback Last Week After a Year of 5.4% Returns
Institutional Shareholders May Be Less Affected by Flowers Foods, Inc.'s (NYSE:FLO) Pullback Last Week After a Year of 5.4% Returns
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Flowers Foods' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 16 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 显著高的机构持有量意味着花苑食品的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感。
- 前16大股东持有公司50%的股份。
- 通过分析师的预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
A look at the shareholders of Flowers Foods, Inc. (NYSE:FLO) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看花苑食品公司(纽交所:FLO)的股东情况可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。 机构持有71%的股份,是公司中持股最高的群体。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最大的收益(如果出现下跌,则损失最多)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.0% last week. Still, the 5.4% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
投资亏损是所有股东都不喜欢的事情,尤其是上周看到持股价值下降3.0%的机构投资者。不过,5.4%的年度收益可能帮助减轻了他们的整体损失。然而,我们假设他们会关注未来的弱势。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Flowers Foods.
在下面的图表中,我们深入研究花苑食品的不同所有权组。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Flowers Foods?
机构持股告诉我们关于花苑食品什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
We can see that Flowers Foods does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Flowers Foods' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到花苑食品确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这一事实来依赖,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,查看花苑食品的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Flowers Foods is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.7% and 4.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO A. McMullian is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能会不得不关注他们的偏好。花苑食品并不被对冲基金拥有。先锋集团目前是公司的最大股东,持有11%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约8.7%和4.1%的股票。此外,首席执行官A. McMullian拥有公司1.3%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
通过查看股东登记,我们可以看到,前16大股东控制着50%的所有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数权益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解市场趋势同样也是有意义的。现在有相当多的分析师关注这只股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Flowers Foods
花苑食品的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然内部人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层负责业务的运行,但首席执行官会向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部人持股是一种积极的现象,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东的利益高度一致。然而,在某些情况下,这个群体内的权力可能过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Flowers Foods, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$339m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士在花苑食品公司拥有一些股份。这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的协调非常好。内部人士拥有价值33900万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内部人士的协调问题,可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Flowers Foods. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众一般是个人投资者,他们在花苑食品中持有21%的股份。虽然这种持股规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Flowers Foods better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Flowers Foods .
考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地理解花苑食品,我们还需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的花苑食品的一个警告信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于该公司的分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。