Institutional Investors Control 50% of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 6.9%
Institutional Investors Control 50% of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 6.9%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Full Truck Alliance's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 10% of Full Truck Alliance
- 鉴于机构对该股票的巨大持股,满帮的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
- 内部人员持有满帮10%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看满帮股份有限公司(纽交所:YMM)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有最大份额的集团是机构,拥有50%的股份。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 6.9% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 54% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
因此,机构投资者在公司股价上周上涨6.9%后获得了丰厚的回报。目前股东的年度回报率为54%,而上周的涨幅更是锦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Full Truck Alliance, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解满帮的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Full Truck Alliance?
机构所有权告诉我们关于满帮的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Full Truck Alliance already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Full Truck Alliance's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
满帮已经在股份登记中有机构投资者。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这在专业投资者中表明了一定的信誉。但是,我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像所有人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在他们在“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个参与者可能会竞争快速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以看到满帮的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,事情的真相远不止如此。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Full Truck Alliance. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 5.3% of the stock. Hui Zhang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对满帮的对冲基金没有进行有意义的投资。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是Sb Investment Advisers (UK) Limited,拥有13%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大的股东分别持有约10%和5.3%的股票。第二大股东Hui Zhang同时也是首席执行官。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册上看,13大股东控制了51%的股权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有这一股权的大多数利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Full Truck Alliance
满帮的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.. Insiders own US$1.2b worth of shares in the US$11b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有满帮股份有限公司合理比例的股份。内部人士在这家估值110亿美元的公司中拥有价值12亿美元的股票。这相当有意义。多数人会说,这显示出与股东之间的良好一致性,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括零售投资者在内的公众持有该公司21%的股份,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然这种所有权比例可能不足以使决策有利于他们,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Full Truck Alliance. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股权投资公司持有满帮18%的股份。这表明他们在关键政策决策中可能具有影响力。有时我们会看到股权投资持有较长时间,但一般而言,他们的投资视野较短,正如名称所示,他们在公开公司中投资较少。在一段时间后,他们可能会考虑卖出并将资本重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。