Is Trex Company (NYSE:TREX) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Trex Company (NYSE:TREX) Using Too Much Debt?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Trex Company, Inc. (NYSE:TREX) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
有些人认为,相较于债务,波动性是投资者思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously 说过:‘波动性远非风险的同义词。’所以,当你考虑任何特定股票的风险时,考虑债务可能显而易见,因为过多的债务可能会使公司陷入困境。我们可以看到 Trex Company, Inc.(纽交所:TREX)确实在其业务中使用债务。但更重要的问题是:这些债务造成了多少风险?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务可以帮助企业,直到企业无法用新资本或自由现金流偿还债务。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以控制企业。然而,通常情况下(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东权益,以控制债务。当然,债务可以是企业中重要的工具,特别是在资本密集型企业中。在考虑公司的债务水平时的第一步是考虑其现金和债务总额。
What Is Trex Company's Net Debt?
Trex 公司的净债务是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Trex Company had US$70.0m of debt, up from US$56.5m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. On the flip side, it has US$12.8m in cash leading to net debt of about US$57.2m.
正如您在下面看到的,截至2024年9月底,Trex 公司的债务为7000万美元,较一年前的5650万美元有所增加。点击图片获取更多细节。另一方面,它有1280万美元的现金,导致净债务约为5720万美元。
How Healthy Is Trex Company's Balance Sheet?
Trex公司的资产负债表健康状况如何?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Trex Company had liabilities of US$251.2m due within a year, and liabilities of US$128.1m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$12.8m and US$140.1m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$226.4m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,Trex公司的负债为25120万美元,需在一年内偿还,此外还有12810万美元的负债需在之后偿还。另一方面,它有现金1280万美元和价值14010万美元的应收账款需在一年内偿还。因此,它的负债总额比现金和短期应收账款的总和多出22640万美元。
Of course, Trex Company has a market capitalization of US$8.32b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time. But either way, Trex Company has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!
当然,Trex公司的市值为83.2亿美元,因此这些负债可能是可控的。然而,我们确实认为值得关注其资产负债表的强度,因为这可能会随着时间变化。但无论如何,Trex公司几乎没有净负债,因此可以公平地说,它的债务负担并不重!
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
Trex Company has a low debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.15. But the really cool thing is that it actually managed to receive more interest than it paid, over the last year. So it's fair to say it can handle debt like a hotshot teppanyaki chef handles cooking. And we also note warmly that Trex Company grew its EBIT by 14% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Trex Company can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Trex公司的债务与EBITDA的比率仅为0.15。但真正令人惊讶的是,在过去的一年里,它实际上收取的利息超过了支付的利息。因此可以公平地说,它能像优秀的铁板烧厨师一样处理债务。我们还温暖地注意到,Trex公司去年的EBIT增长了14%,使得其债务负担更易于处理。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到了大部分关于债务的知识。但最终,业务的未来盈利能力将决定Trex公司是否能在长时间内增强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的看法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Trex Company recorded free cash flow of 41% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最后,一家公司只能用冷硬的现金来偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,值得检查EBIT中有多少是由自由现金流支持的。根据最近三年的数据,Trex公司的自由现金流占其EBIT的41%,这比我们期望的要弱。这在偿还债务方面并不理想。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, Trex Company's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that Trex Company takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Trex Company you should be aware of.
幸运的是,Trex公司的利息覆盖率令人印象深刻,这表明它在债务方面占据优势。而好消息并不仅此而已,因为它的净债务与EBITDA的比率也支持了这一印象!考虑到所有这些数据,我们认为Trex公司在债务方面采取了相当理智的方法。虽然这带来了一些风险,但它也可以提升股东的回报。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是关注的重点。然而,并非所有投资风险都与资产负债表相关,远非如此。举个例子:我们发现了1个警告信号,您应该注意Trex公司。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
当一切尘埃落定时,有时更容易专注于那些甚至不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费查看零净债务的成长股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。