share_log

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 79% of the Company

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 79% of the Company

爱默生电气公司(纽交所:EMR)受到机构投资者的青睐,他们持有公司79%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/09 23:11

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Emerson Electric implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构在艾默生电气的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响。
  • 前25大股东拥有该公司47%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

Every investor in Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

艾默生电气公司(纽交所:EMR)的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有79%的股份,成为最大的股东。换句话说,该集团在对公司的投资中,最有可能获得最大收益(或承受最大损失)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Emerson Electric.

在下图中,我们放大艾默生电气的不同所有权集团。

big
NYSE:EMR Ownership Breakdown December 9th 2024
纽交所:EMR 所有权分布 2024年12月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerson Electric?

机构持有情况对艾默生电气有什么启示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Emerson Electric. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Emerson Electric's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者在艾默生电气中拥有相当的股份。这可以表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持警惕。他们有时也会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得关注艾默生电气的盈利历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:EMR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 9th 2024
纽交所:艾默生电气收益和营业收入增长2024年12月9日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Emerson Electric. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以集体发挥显著的权力。我们注意到对艾默生电气的对冲基金并没有进行重大投资。先锋集团目前是最大的股东,持有9.3%的流通股。作为对比,第二大股东持有约6.3%的流通股,第三大股东拥有4.5%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Emerson Electric

艾默生电气的内部股东持股情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that Emerson Electric Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$256m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息显示,艾默生电气公司的内部人士拥有不到1%的股份。由于公司如此庞大,我们不期望内部人士拥有大量股票。总体而言,他们持有25600万美元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股份是件好事,但检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Emerson Electric. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有艾默生电气21%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能够决定大局,但他们确实可以对公司的运行产生真实的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Emerson Electric better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Emerson Electric you should be aware of.

考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地理解艾默生电气,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如:我们发现了3个你应该注意的艾默生电气的警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发