After a Year of 1.7% Returns, Ardelyx, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARDX) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors
After a Year of 1.7% Returns, Ardelyx, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARDX) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ardelyx's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 显著的高机构持股意味着Ardelyx的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感
- 前21大股东持有公司50%的股份
- 内部人士最近一直在买入
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ardelyx, Inc. (NASDAQ:ARDX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解Ardelyx, Inc.(纳斯达克:ARDX)真正的控制权,了解公司的所有权结构是很重要的。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有62%的股份。从某种意义上说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或遭受最大损失)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$64m last week. However, the 1.7% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
机构投资者在公司市值上周下降6400万美元后遭受了最大损失。然而,1.7%的年回报可能帮助减轻了他们的整体损失。然而,他们应该关注未来可能的进一步损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ardelyx.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Ardelyx的事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ardelyx?
机构持股告诉我们关于Ardelyx的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that Ardelyx does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ardelyx's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到Ardelyx确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这表明在专业投资者中存在一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞争快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Ardelyx的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是比这更复杂。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ardelyx. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Janus Henderson Group plc with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此他们可以集体拥有重大权力。对冲基金在Ardelyx中的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,最大股东是Janus Henderson Group plc,拥有10%的流通股。为便于理解,第二大股东持有大约7.5%的流通股,第三大股东持有5.7%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我们对所有权数据的深入分析表明,前21大股东的总持股达到50%,意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构持股是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的效果。覆盖该股票的分析师数量相对合理,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Ardelyx
Ardelyx的内部人持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终是包括在内的。管理层最终对董事会负责。不过,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内幕所有权表明领导者像真正的公司所有者那样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高内幕所有权也可能赋予公司内部小集团巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Ardelyx, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$32m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以报告,内部人士确实拥有Ardelyx, Inc.的股票。内部人士的股份总值为3200万美元。大多数人认为这是一个真实的积极因素。大多数人会说这显示了股东与董事会之间的利益一致性。不过,值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在出售股票。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in Ardelyx. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众,一般来说是个体投资者,在Ardelyx中持有36%的股份。虽然这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ardelyx better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ardelyx has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
始终值得考虑拥有一家公司股票的不同群体。但要更好地理解Ardelyx,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 以风险为例 - Ardelyx有1个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。