We Think Kyndryl Holdings (NYSE:KD) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think Kyndryl Holdings (NYSE:KD) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KD) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
传奇基金经理李录(查理·芒格支持的)曾说过:‘最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受资本的永久损失。’所以,当你考虑任何股票的风险时,很明显需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会拖垮一家公司。重要的是,Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.(纽交所:KD)确实有债务。但股东应该担心其债务使用吗?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时会变得危险?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务在企业经营良好时可以提供帮助,直到企业无法偿还债务,无论是通过新资本还是自由现金流。在最坏的情况下,如果一家公司无法偿还债权人,它可能会破产。然而,更常见(但仍然痛苦)的情况是,它不得不以低价发行新股,进而永久性稀释股东的股份。当然,债务在企业中可以是一个重要的工具,尤其是在资本密集型的企业中。在考虑公司债务水平时,第一步是将其现金和债务一起考虑。
What Is Kyndryl Holdings's Net Debt?
Kyndryl Holdings的净债务是多少?
As you can see below, Kyndryl Holdings had US$2.95b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$1.33b, its net debt is less, at about US$1.63b.
正如您在下面看到的,Kyndryl Holdings在2024年9月的债务为29.5亿美元,约与前年相同。您可以单击图表查看更详细的信息。然而,由于其拥有13.3亿美元的现金储备,因此其净债务较低,大约为16.3亿美元。
How Strong Is Kyndryl Holdings' Balance Sheet?
Kyndryl Holdings的资产负债表有多强?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Kyndryl Holdings had liabilities of US$4.25b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.98b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.33b in cash and US$1.49b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$6.41b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
从最新的资产负债表可以看到,Kyndryl Holdings在一年内到期的负债为42.5亿美元,超过一年的负债为49.8亿美元。对此,它有13.3亿美元的现金和14.9亿美元的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和多64.1亿美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$8.02b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Kyndryl Holdings' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
这个赤字相对于它80.2亿美元的市值是相当大的,因此确实建议股东关注Kyndryl Holdings的债务使用情况。如果其贷方要求它巩固资产负债表,股东可能会面临严重的稀释。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
为了衡量一家公司相对于其收益的债务水平,我们计算其净负债与利息、税项、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比率,以及其利息和税项前利润(EBIT)与其利息支出(利息支付比率)的比率。因此,我们考虑了包括和不包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务的情况。
Kyndryl Holdings's net debt is sitting at a very reasonable 1.6 times its EBITDA, while its EBIT covered its interest expense just 3.0 times last year. It seems that the business incurs large depreciation and amortisation charges, so maybe its debt load is heavier than it would first appear, since EBITDA is arguably a generous measure of earnings. We also note that Kyndryl Holdings improved its EBIT from a last year's loss to a positive US$344m. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Kyndryl Holdings's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Kyndryl Holdings的净债务为其EBITDA的1.6倍,而其EBIT去年的利息支出仅覆盖了3.0倍。似乎该业务产生了大量的折旧和摊销费用,因此其债务负担可能比乍看之下更重,因为EBITDA可以说是一个比较宽松的盈利衡量标准。我们还注意到Kyndryl Holdings将其EBIT从去年的亏损改善到了正的34400万美元。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到大部分有关债务的信息。但更重要的是,未来的收益将决定Kyndryl Holdings维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你专注于未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,该报告显示了分析师的利润预测。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) is backed by free cash flow. In the last year, Kyndryl Holdings created free cash flow amounting to 15% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.
最后,一家业务需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法满足。因此,检查税前利润(EBIT)中有多少是由自由现金流支持的价值不大。在过去一年中,Kyndryl Holdings创造的自由现金流占其EBIT的15%,表现平平。这个疲软的现金转化水平削弱了它管理和偿还债务的能力。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, Kyndryl Holdings's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its interest cover was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least its net debt to EBITDA is not so bad. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Kyndryl Holdings stock a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. In light of our reservations about the company's balance sheet, it seems sensible to check if insiders have been selling shares recently.
从表面上看,Kyndryl Holdings将EBIT转换为自由现金流让我们对这只股票感到犹豫,而其利息覆盖率也没有比一年中最繁忙的晚上那家空餐厅更令人心动。 但至少其净债务与EBITDA的比率还算可以。 考虑到资产负债表和所有这些因素,我们确实认为债务使得Kyndryl Holdings的股票有点风险。 这并不一定是坏事,但我们通常会更倾向于选择更少杠杆的情况。 鉴于我们对该公司资产负债表的顾虑,检查内部人士最近是否卖出了股票似乎是明智的。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
经过一番考虑,有时候关注那些根本不需要负债的公司会更容易。读者可以现在免费访问一份零净负债的成长型股票名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。