Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Qiagen's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 显著的高机构持股意味着Qiagen的股票价格对其交易行为非常敏感。
- 前18大股东持有50%的业务。
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看Qiagen N.V.(纽交所:QGEN)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。持有该公司最大数量股份的群体,确切地说是约82%,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到他们掌握的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有重要影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,投资于公司的大部分机构资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Qiagen, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨Qiagen的每种类型的股东,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Qiagen?
机构持股告诉我们关于Qiagen什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
Qiagen already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Qiagen's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Qiagen已经在股东名册上有机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持谨慎。他们有时也会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,你会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Qiagen的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Qiagen. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Wellington Management Group LLP with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 8.8% and 8.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Massachusetts Financial Services Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。我们注意到,对Qiagen并没有实质性投资的对冲基金。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到,最大股东是威灵顿管理集团有限公司,拥有9.6%的流通股份。贝莱德公司和马萨诸塞金融服务公司分别拥有8.8%和8.1%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细查看我们的所有权数据,前18大股东的合并持股比例达到了50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有绝对多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股可以为您的研究增值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。相当多的分析师覆盖了该股票,因此您可以很容易地了解预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Qiagen
Qiagen的内部人持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终是包括在内的。管理层最终对董事会负责。不过,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内幕所有权表明领导者像真正的公司所有者那样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高内幕所有权也可能赋予公司内部小集团巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Qiagen N.V.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$44m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士持有的Qiagen N.V.股票不足1%。由于它是一家大公司,我们仅期望内部人士持有其小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值4400万美元的股份。看到至少有一些内部人士持有股份总是好的,但可能需要检查这些内部人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Qiagen. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众持有17%的股份,主要由个体投资者组成,对Qiagen有一定的影响力。虽然这种持股比例可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Qiagen that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常重要的,但还有其他因素更加重要。 例如,我们发现了3个关于Qiagen的警示信号,您在此投资前应注意这些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你和我一样,可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是会缩减。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。