share_log

Tiptree Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TIPT) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Michael Barnes Sees Holdings Value Fall by 6.1% Following Recent Drop

Tiptree Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TIPT) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Michael Barnes Sees Holdings Value Fall by 6.1% Following Recent Drop

Tiptree Inc.(纳斯达克:TIPT)最大股东、首席执行官迈克尔·巴恩斯的持股价值在近期下跌后下降了6.1%。
Simply Wall St ·  12/10 20:33

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Tiptree's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Tiptree is 40%
  • Tiptree显著的内部持股表明对公司扩展的固有利益
  • 共有5位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,持股比例为53%
  • Tiptree的机构持股为40%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Tiptree Inc. (NASDAQ:TIPT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了Tiptree Inc.(纳斯达克:TIPT),理解该业务的持股结构非常重要。持有公司最多股份的团体,具体来说,约为42%,是个人内部人员。换句话说,该团体的投资最可能获得最大收益(或损失)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$52m.

因此,内部人士作为一个整体在市值下降5200万美元后遭受了最大的损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tiptree, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究Tiptree的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqCM:TIPT Ownership Breakdown December 10th 2024
纳斯达克CM:TIPt 所有权分布 2024年12月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tiptree?

机构所有权对Tiptree意味着什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Tiptree. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tiptree's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Tiptree中拥有相当的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师看过这只股票并且喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在他们参与'拥挤交易'的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个参与方可能会竞相迅速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Tiptree的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,背后总还有更多的故事。

big
NasdaqCM:TIPT Earnings and Revenue Growth December 10th 2024
纳斯达克CM:TIPt 2024年12月10日的营业收入和收益增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Tiptree. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Tiptree's case, its Top Key Executive, Michael Barnes, is the largest shareholder, holding 27% of shares outstanding. With 9.5% and 6.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Arif Inayatullah and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Jonathan Ilany directly holds 4.2% of the total shares outstanding.

对冲基金在Tiptree的股份不多。因为行动胜于言辞,当内部人士拥有公司显著股份时,我们认为这是一个好兆头。在Tiptree的情况下,公司的首席执行官Michael Barnes是最大的股东,持有27%的流通股。Arif Inayatullah和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分别是第二和第三大股东,持有9.5%和6.8%的流通股。此外,公司的CEO Jonathan Ilany直接持有总流通股的4.2%。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 53% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了一个事实,即大约53%的公司由前五大股东控制,这表明这些股东对业务有显著的影响力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以为你的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,可以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师覆盖,因此可能不为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Tiptree

Tiptree的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的法律管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。公司的管理层向董事会负责,而董事会应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内幕所有权表明领导者像真正的公司所有者那样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高内幕所有权也可能赋予公司内部小集团巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Tiptree Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$814m, and insiders have US$341m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看起来内部人士拥有Tiptree Inc.的相当大比例股份。它的市值仅为81400万美元,而内部人士名下的股票价值达到34100万美元。我们可以说这显示出与股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人士可能是公司的创始人。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Tiptree. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众持有18%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对Tiptree有一定程度的影响力。虽然这个群体可能无法主导决策,但显然可以对公司的运行产生真正影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tiptree better, we need to consider many other factors.

考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体始终是值得思考的。但要更好地理解Tiptree,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢深入研究一家公司过去的表现。您可以在此详细图表中找到历史营业收入和收益。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是买入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我们免费的有趣前景集合,拥有良好的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发