WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies WD-40 Company (NASDAQ:WDFC) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
霍华德·马克斯说得很好,他提到,与其担心股票价格的波动,'我担心的是永久性损失的可能性...而我认识的每个实用投资者也都有这样的担忧。' 当我们考虑一家公司有多风险时,我们总是喜欢查看其债务的使用情况,因为债务过重可能导致破产。与许多其他公司一样,WD-40公司(纳斯达克:WDFC)也使用债务。但是这项债务对股东来说是个问题吗?
When Is Debt A Problem?
何时债务成为问题?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
一般来说,只有当一家公司不能轻松偿还债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题,无论是通过融资还是靠自身的现金流。如果情况真的很糟糕,贷款人可能会控制业务。然而,更常见(但仍然痛苦)的情形是,该公司不得不以低价筹集新股权资本,从而永久性稀释股东权益。虽然如此,最常见的情况是公司合理管理其债务,并使之对自身有利。当我们考虑一家公司对债务的使用时,首先要查看现金和债务的整体情况。
How Much Debt Does WD-40 Carry?
WD-40的债务有多少?
As you can see below, WD-40 had US$94.6m of debt at August 2024, down from US$120.5m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$46.7m, its net debt is less, at about US$47.9m.
正如您在下面看到的,WD-40在2024年8月的债务为9460万美元,低于一年前的12050万美元。然而,由于它的现金储备为4670万美元,其净债务更低,约为4790万美元。
How Strong Is WD-40's Balance Sheet?
WD-40的资产负债表有多强?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that WD-40 had liabilities of US$103.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$115.0m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$46.7m and US$118.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$53.8m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
从最近的资产负债表可以看出,WD-40的负债为10350万美元,需在一年内到期,且11500万美元的负债在之后到期。另一方面,它有4670万美元的现金和11800万美元的应收账款在一年内到期。因此,它的负债总共比现金和短期应收账款的总和多出5380万美元。
This state of affairs indicates that WD-40's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So it's very unlikely that the US$3.71b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Carrying virtually no net debt, WD-40 has a very light debt load indeed.
这种状况表明,WD-40的资产负债表看起来相当稳健,因为其总负债恰好与流动资产相等。因此,这家37.1亿美元的公司不太可能出现现金短缺,但仍然值得关注资产负债表。WD-40几乎没有净债务,确实负担很轻。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我们使用两个主要的比率来告诉我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),而第二个是其利润前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖其利息费用的次数(或其利息覆盖率,简称)。因此,我们考虑与折旧和摊销费用相关的盈利以及没有相关费用的盈利相对于债务水平。
WD-40 has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.45. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 25.3 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. The good news is that WD-40 has increased its EBIT by 7.4% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if WD-40 can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
WD-40的净债务与EBITDA的比率仅为0.45。而其EBIT能够覆盖利息支出多达25.3倍。因此我们对其超保守的债务使用感到相当轻松。好消息是WD-40在过去12个月中将EBIT提高了7.4%,这应该会缓解对债务偿还的顾虑。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是重点关注的地方。但最终,业务的未来盈利能力将决定WD-40能否随着时间的推移而增强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的看法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告会很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, WD-40 produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 64% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
但我们的最终考虑也是重要的,因为公司不能仅用纸面利润来偿还债务;它需要现金。因此,检查一下EBIT有多少是由自由现金流支持的,值得关注。在过去的三年里,WD-40产生了强劲的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的64%,大致符合我们的预期。这种自由现金流使公司在适当的时候有良好的能力偿还债务。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, WD-40's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think WD-40's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - WD-40 has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
高兴的是,WD-40令人印象深刻的利息覆盖率意味着它在债务方面占据优势。好消息还不止于此,因为它的净债务与EBITDA的比率也支持这一观点!从更大的角度来看,我们认为WD-40的债务使用似乎相当合理,我们对此并不担心。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提高股本收益。当分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个明显的起点。然而,并非所有投资风险都存在于资产负债表中——远非如此。例如——WD-40有1个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。