share_log

Is PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) Using Too Much Debt?

Is PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) Using Too Much Debt?

PHINIA(纽交所:PHIN)是否使用了过多的债务?
Simply Wall St ·  12/11 21:38

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies PHINIA Inc. (NYSE:PHIN) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously 说过:‘波动性与风险完全不同。’ 当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢查看其负债情况,因为负债过重可能导致毁灭性后果。 与许多其他公司一样,PHINIA Inc.(纽交所代码:PHIN)也使用负债。但是,更重要的问题是:这些负债产生了多少风险?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务带来了什么风险?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

一般来说,负债只有在公司无法轻易偿还时,才会成为真正的问题,或者通过筹集资金,或者通过自身的现金流。 资本主义的一部分是‘创造性破坏’的过程,其中失败的企业会被他们的银行家无情地清算。 虽然这并不常见,但我们经常会看到负债累累的公司永久性地稀释股东,因为贷方迫使他们以低价筹集资金。 当然,负债在企业中可以是一个重要的工具,特别是资本密集型企业。 当我们检查负债水平时,首先要一起考虑现金和负债水平。

How Much Debt Does PHINIA Carry?

PHINIA背负了多少债务?

As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, PHINIA had US$985.0m of debt, up from US$800.0m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$477.0m, its net debt is less, at about US$508.0m.

如您所见,截至2024年9月底,PHINIA有98500万美元的负债,比一年前增加了80000万美元。点击图片了解更多详细信息。 然而,由于其现金储备为47700万美元,净负债较少,约为50800万美元。

big
NYSE:PHIN Debt to Equity History December 11th 2024
纽交所:PHIN债务与股本历史 2024年12月11日

A Look At PHINIA's Liabilities

查看PHINIA的负债

According to the last reported balance sheet, PHINIA had liabilities of US$1.02b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.30b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$477.0m as well as receivables valued at US$920.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$923.0m.

根据最近报告的资产负债表,PHINIA的负债为10.2亿美金,在12个月内到期,超过12个月到期的负债为13亿美金。抵消这些义务的是47700万美金的现金,以及在12个月内到期的应收账款价值为92000万美金。因此,它的负债超过了现金和(短期)应收账款总和92300万美金。

This deficit isn't so bad because PHINIA is worth US$2.23b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

这个赤字并不算太糟,因为PHINIA的价值为22.3亿美金,因此如果有需要的话,它可能能够筹集足够的资金来巩固其资产负债表。但我们绝对希望保持警惕,以便察觉其债务是否带来了过大的风险。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过看净债务与息税折旧及摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比率,以及计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何轻松地覆盖利息费用(利息覆盖)来衡量一家公司相对于其获利能力的债务负担。这样,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量,也考虑了其支付的利率。

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.0 and interest cover of 3.7 times, it seems to us that PHINIA is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Sadly, PHINIA's EBIT actually dropped 9.6% in the last year. If earnings continue on that decline then managing that debt will be difficult like delivering hot soup on a unicycle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine PHINIA's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

根据其净债务与EBITDA的比例为1.0和利息覆盖率为3.7倍,我们认为PHINIA可能合理地利用了债务。但利息支付无疑足以让我们考虑其债务的可负担性。可悲的是,PHINIA的EBIT在过去一年实际上下降了9.6%。如果收益持续下降,那么管理这些债务将会像骑独轮车送热汤一样困难。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是检查的起点。但未来的收益,尤其是,将决定PHINIA保持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你关注未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,显示分析师的利润预测。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, PHINIA produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 53% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

但我们的最后考虑也是重要的,因为一个公司不能用纸面利润来偿还债务;它需要现金。所以,逻辑步骤是看看EBIT中实际自由现金流匹配的比例。在过去三年里,PHINIA产生了相当于其EBIT 53%的强劲自由现金流,差不多是我们所期望的。这一自由现金流让公司在适当的时候有良好的条件来偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Even if we have reservations about how easily PHINIA is capable of (not) growing its EBIT, its net debt to EBITDA and conversion of EBIT to free cash flow make us think feel relatively unconcerned. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that PHINIA is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. Given our hesitation about the stock, it would be good to know if PHINIA insiders have sold any shares recently. You click here to find out if insiders have sold recently.

即使我们对PHINIA的EBIT增长能力有保留,其净债务与EBITDA比率以及EBIT转化为自由现金流的能力让我们感觉相对不太担心。 考虑到上述所有因素,我们认为由于其债务,PHINIA是一项有一定风险的投资。这并不一定是坏事,因为杠杆可以提高股本回报,但这是需要注意的事项。 鉴于我们对该股票的犹豫,了解PHINIA内部人士最近是否出售了任何股票将是个好主意。您可以点击这里查看内部人士最近是否出售了股票。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发