share_log

While Private Equity Firms Own 40% of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 48% Ownership

While Private Equity Firms Own 40% of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 48% Ownership

虽然股权投资公司拥有新翔集团40%的股份,但散户投资者是其最大股东,拥有48%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/12 06:01

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significant control over SATS by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
  • Institutions own 12% of SATS
  • 散户投资者对新翔集团的显著控制意味着公众在影响管理和治理相关决策方面拥有更多权力
  • 前20大股东持有该业务的50%
  • 机构持有新翔集团12%的股份

A look at the shareholders of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看新翔集团有限公司(新加坡交易所:S58)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。我们可以看到散户投资者在公司中拥有48%的股份,拥有最多的股份。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

And private equity firms on the other hand have a 40% ownership in the company.

另一方面,股权投资公司在该公司拥有40%的股份。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SATS.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于新翔集团不同的持股群体。

big
SGX:S58 Ownership Breakdown December 11th 2024
新加坡交易所:S58 股权结构 2024年12月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SATS?

机构持股情况对新翔集团有何启示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。

SATS already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SATS, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

新翔集团的股份登记中已经有机构的存在。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师对这只股票进行了调查,并且他们对此持肯定态度。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看新翔集团过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,还要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SGX:S58 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 11th 2024
新加坡交易所:S58 2024年12月11日的盈利和营业收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SATS. Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 2.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

对冲基金在新翔集团的持股并不多。淡马锡持仓(私人)有限公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有40%的流通股。为了提供背景,第二大股东约持有2.3%的流通股,第三大股东也持有2.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更仔细地查看我们的持股数据表明,前20名股东的合计持股比例为50%,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股是评估和筛选股票预期表现的一个好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现这一点。相当多的分析师覆盖该股票,因此您可以很容易地查看预测增长情况。

Insider Ownership Of SATS

SATS的内部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的管辖区有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终需要向董事会负责。然而,管理者担任执行董事会成员并不罕见,特别是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内幕所有权表明领导者像真正的公司所有者那样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高内幕所有权也可能赋予公司内部小集团巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of SATS Ltd. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$18m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士在SATS有限公司中以自己名义持有不到1%的股份。 这是一家大公司,因此即使是小额的比例利益也可以在董事会和股东之间创造一致性。在这种情况下,内部人士拥有价值1800万新元的股票。看到至少一些内部人持有股份总是好的,但可能值得检查这些内部人是否有在卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in SATS. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众,通常是个人投资者,持有SATS 48%的股份。 尽管这个群体不一定能决定大局,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 40% stake in SATS. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股权投资公司持有新翔集团40%的股份。这意味着他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓舞,因为股权投资有时能够促进策略,使市场看到公司的价值。另一种可能性是,这些持有人可能会在将其上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that SATS is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我发现研究公司具体拥有者非常有趣。但要获得真正的洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,新翔集团显示出1个警告信号,您应该了解...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你和我一样,可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是会缩减。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发