Institutional Investors in Eaton Corporation Plc (NYSE:ETN) Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Institutional Investors in Eaton Corporation Plc (NYSE:ETN) Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Eaton's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 24 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由于机构在股票中持有大量股份,伊顿的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前24大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
- 高管近期的卖出行为
If you want to know who really controls Eaton Corporation plc (NYSE:ETN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了伊顿公司(纽交所:ETN),那么你需要看看其股份注册的构成。机构持有83%的股份,掌握了公司的最大股份。这意味着,如果股票上涨,该团体将获得最大的利益(或在市场下跌时损失最多)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.1% last week. However, the 55% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投资亏损是股东们都不愿意经历的事情,尤其是机构投资者上周他们的持股价值下跌了4.1%。然而,55%的年度回报可能有助于缓解他们的总体损失。但他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Eaton, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地探讨一下伊顿的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Eaton?
机构持股告诉我们关于伊顿的什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
Eaton already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Eaton, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
伊顿的股东名册上已经有机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中存在一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出不好的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,看到股价大幅下降并不罕见。因此,查看伊顿的历史收益轨迹(见下文)是值得的。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Eaton. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.4% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 4.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对伊顿的投资对冲基金并没有重大投资。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是先锋集团,持有9.4%的流通股。贝莱德和道富银行分别是第二和第三大股东,分别持有7.4%和4.2%的流通股。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记册,我们可以看到51%的所有权被前24位股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有大多数的所有权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一种良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师覆盖此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Eaton
伊顿内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能具有主观性,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终需要对董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或CEO的情况下。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Eaton Corporation plc. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$276m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士在伊顿公司的持股低于1%。这是一个非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有公司大量股份会让人感到惊讶。尽管他们的持股低于1%,我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值27600万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否有在买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众——包括散户投资者——在公司中拥有16%的股份,因此无法轻易被忽视。虽然这样的持股规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以在公司政策上产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Eaton that you should be aware of.
我发现查看谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举例来说,我们已经识别出伊顿需要注意的一个警告信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。