Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Hayward Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构在海沃德控股公司(Hayward Holdings)的大量持有表明他们对公司股票价格有显著影响。
- 前12个股东持有51%的业务。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。
A look at the shareholders of Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看海沃德控股公司(Hayward Holdings, Inc.)的股东(纽交所:HAYW)可以告诉我们哪个团体最有权力。而持有最大份额的团体是机构,拥有87%的股份。换句话说,该团体从其对公司的投资中最有可能获得收益(或遭受损失)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
因为机构股东拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策通常会受到重视,尤其是对于个人投资者。因此,投资于公司的大量机构资金通常代表着对其未来的巨大信心。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hayward Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨一下海沃德控股的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hayward Holdings?
机构股权告知我们海沃德控股什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hayward Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hayward Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在海沃德控股中拥有相当一部分股份。这在专业投资者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像每个人一样。如果多个机构在同一时间改变了对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看海沃德控股的盈利历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hayward Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 9.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.1% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
机构投资者持有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。我们注意到对海沃德控股的对冲基金没有显著投资。公司的最大股东是FMR LLC,拥有9.3%的股份。与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有8.1%和7.3%的流通股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东注册,我们可以看到前12大股东控制了51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有大多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Hayward Holdings
海沃德控股的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能具有主观性,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终需要对董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或CEO的情况下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$18m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士持有海沃德控股公司少于1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士持有价值1800万美元的股票。绝对值可能比比例股份更重要。可以说,近期的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有进行买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众普遍,尤其是零售投资者,持有公司12%的股份,因此不能被轻易忽视。尽管这部分持股可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hayward Holdings .
我发现研究谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。不过,要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意到我们发现的与海沃德控股相关的一个警告信号。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。