Kunlun Energy Company Limited's (HKG:135) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged HK$2.9b Last Week
Kunlun Energy Company Limited's (HKG:135) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged HK$2.9b Last Week
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significant control over Kunlun Energy by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (China National Petroleum Corporation)
- 15% of Kunlun Energy is held by Institutions
- 私人公司对昆仑能源的重大控制意味着公众在管理和治理相关决策中拥有更大的影响力。
- 该公司的58%由一个单一股东(中国石油天然气集团公司)持有。
- 15%的昆仑能源由机构持有。
If you want to know who really controls Kunlun Energy Company Limited (HKG:135), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制昆仑能源有限公司(HKG:135),那么你就必须查看其股权登记的构成。我们可以看到私营公司在该公司拥有58%的股份。换句话说,这个集团在对公司的投资中最有可能获得最多收益(或损失最多)。
Clearly, private companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$2.9b last week.
显然,私营公司在上周公司市值增加了29亿港元后受益最大。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Kunlun Energy.
在下方的图表中,我们重点关注了昆仑能源的不同股东群体。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kunlun Energy?
机构持股对昆仑能源告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
Kunlun Energy already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kunlun Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
昆仑能源的股东名册上已经有机构持股。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这在专业投资者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个参与者可能会争相快速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。你可以看到下方昆仑能源的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,背后的故事总是更复杂。

Kunlun Energy is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that China National Petroleum Corporation is the largest shareholder with 58% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 1.7% and 1.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
昆仑能源并不被对冲基金所持有。我们的数据显示,中国石油天然气集团公司是最大的股东,拥有58%的流通股份。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有控股权。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有1.7%和1.5%的流通股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
虽然研究一家公司机构的所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的看法也同样重要,以了解市场的动态。很多分析师关注这只股票,因此查看他们的预测也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Kunlun Energy
昆仑能源的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终算作内部人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is rare to see such a low level of personal ownership, amongst the board (and it is possible that our data might be incomplete). Concerned investors should check here to see if insiders have been selling or buying.
我们的数据无法确认董事会成员是否个人持有股票。董事会成员个人持股水平如此之低是非常罕见的(而且我们的数据可能不完整)。关心的投资者应该查看这里,看看内部人士是否有卖出或买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众,包括散户投资者,在公司中持有28%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这一持股规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 58%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司持有该公司58%的股份。可能值得深入研究一下。如果相关方,例如内部人士,对这些私营公司有兴趣,应该在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司有战略兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Kunlun Energy has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。 例如,风险 - 我们认为昆仑能源有1个警告信号,您应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。