NYOCOR (SHSE:600821) Seems To Be Using A Lot Of Debt
NYOCOR (SHSE:600821) Seems To Be Using A Lot Of Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that NYOCOR Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600821) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
有人说波动性,而不是债务,是投资者思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously 说过,‘波动性远未等同于风险。’ 所以看来聪明的钱知道,债务——通常与破产有关——是评估一个公司风险时非常重要的因素。我们注意到,金开新能有限公司(SHSE:600821)确实在其资产负债表上有债务。但是,股东是否应该担心其债务使用呢?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
债务带来了什么风险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
当企业无法轻松履行那些义务时,债务和其他负债就会变得风险很大,无论是通过自由现金流还是以具有吸引力的价格增资。最终,如果公司无法履行法律义务偿还债务,股东可能会一无所获。然而,更常见的(但仍然昂贵的)情况是,公司必须在低廉的股价下稀释股东,仅为控制债务。但通过替代稀释,债务对于那些需要资本投资以获得高回报增长的企业,可以是一个极好的工具。当我们审视债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平,这两者结合在一起。
How Much Debt Does NYOCOR Carry?
金开新能的债务有多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, NYOCOR had CN¥22.1b of debt, up from CN¥18.9b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have CN¥1.30b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about CN¥20.8b.
如您所见,在2024年9月底,金开新能的债务为221亿人民币,高于一年前的189亿人民币。点击图片以获取更多详情。然而,它有13亿人民币的现金来抵消这笔债务,导致净债务约为208亿人民币。
How Healthy Is NYOCOR's Balance Sheet?
NYOCOR的资产负债表健康吗?
The latest balance sheet data shows that NYOCOR had liabilities of CN¥8.31b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥18.9b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥1.30b as well as receivables valued at CN¥8.45b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥17.5b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,NYOCOR有83.1亿人民币的负债在一年内到期,以及189亿人民币的负债在之后到期。抵消这些义务,它有13亿人民币的现金以及价值84.5亿人民币的应收账款在12个月内到期。总的来说,它的负债超过现金和短期应收账款合计的175亿人民币。
This deficit casts a shadow over the CN¥11.4b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, NYOCOR would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
这一缺口给这家价值114亿人民币的公司蒙上了一层阴影,就像一座巨大的雕像矗立在凡人面前。因此,我们无疑会密切关注它的资产负债表。最终,如果债权人要求还款,NYOCOR可能需要进行一次重大再资本化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看公司的净债务与息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比率,以及计算息税前利润(EBIT)覆盖利息费用的能力(利息保障率),来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力的情况。这种方法的优势在于,我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(通过净债务与EBITDA的比率)和与该债务相关的实际利息费用(通过其利息保障率)。
NYOCOR has a rather high debt to EBITDA ratio of 7.3 which suggests a meaningful debt load. However, its interest coverage of 2.6 is reasonably strong, which is a good sign. Given the debt load, it's hardly ideal that NYOCOR's EBIT was pretty flat over the last twelve months. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine NYOCOR's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
NYOCOR的债务与EBITDA比率相当高,达到7.3,这表明其负债负担不轻。然而,它的利息覆盖率为2.6,合理强劲,这是一个好迹象。考虑到债务负担,NYOCOR的EBIT在过去12个月几乎持平并不理想。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表无疑是一个明显的起点。但未来的盈利,胜过其他一切,将判断NYOCOR未来保持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,展示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, NYOCOR saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最后,虽然税务机关可能喜欢会计利润,但贷方只接受现金。因此,我们总是检查EBIT中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去三年中,NYOCOR的自由现金流总计出现了大幅负数。虽然这可能是由于增长支出的结果,但这确实使债务风险大大增加。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, NYOCOR's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think NYOCOR has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for NYOCOR that you should be aware of.
表面上看,金开新能的净债务与EBITDA的比率让我们对这只股票感到犹豫,它将EBIT转换为自由现金流的能力也不过比一年中最繁忙的夜晚里那家空荡荡的餐厅更加吸引人。而且,至少它的EBIT增长率还不算太差。在考虑到讨论过的数据点后,我们认为金开新能的债务过多。虽然有些投资者喜欢这种冒险的投资,但这显然不是我们喜欢的。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的债务信息最多。但最终,任何公司都可能包含在资产负债表之外的风险。例如,我们找到了1个金开新能的警示信号,您应该注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
最终,通常更好的是关注没有净负债的公司。你可以访问我们特别列出这些公司的名单(所有公司都有盈利增长的记录)。这是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。