Private Companies Are Materialise NV's (NASDAQ:MTLS) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$62m Last Week
Private Companies Are Materialise NV's (NASDAQ:MTLS) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$62m Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Materialise's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- Idem owns 56% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Materialise is 12%
- Materialise拥有大量的私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
- Idem 拥有该公司 56% 的股份
- Materialise 的机构所有权为 12%
If you want to know who really controls Materialise NV (NASDAQ:MTLS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制着Materialise NV(纳斯达克股票代码:MTLS),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为56%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.
结果,私营公司是上周14%涨幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Materialise.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Materialise的什么。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Materialise?
关于Materiase,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会变得更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会注册一些机构,尤其是在它们成长的情况下。
We can see that Materialise does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Materialise's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,Materialise确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Materialise的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

Materialise is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Idem is the largest shareholder with 56% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.7% and 1.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
Materialise 不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,Idem是最大股东,已发行股份的56%。这实质上意味着他们对公司的未来具有广泛的影响力,甚至是完全的控制权。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的2.7%和1.8%。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解公众舆论也是有意义的。有很多分析师报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Materialise
Materialise 的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东的关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Materialise NV. It has a market capitalization of just US$480m, and insiders have US$9.8m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以看到,内部人士拥有内华达州Materialise的股份。它的市值仅为4.8亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值980万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Materialise. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有30%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Materialise有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 56%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的56%。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Materialise , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。我们已经在Materialise中发现了一个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。