share_log

HP Inc.'s (NYSE:HPQ) Institutional Investors Lost 3.3% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

HP Inc.'s (NYSE:HPQ) Institutional Investors Lost 3.3% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

惠普(纽交所:HPQ)的机构投资者上周损失了3.3%,但从长期收益中获得了好处
Simply Wall St ·  12/13 21:10

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies HP's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 显著的高机构持股意味着惠普的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感。
  • 50%的业务由前15位股东持有。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制惠普(纽交所:HPQ),了解业务的所有权结构是很重要的。 持有公司股票最多的群体,大约精确到83%,是机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这一群体将获得最多利益(如果出现下跌,他们将损失最多)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$33b last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

机构投资者是公司市值上周跌至330亿美元后受到影响最大的群体。然而,给股东带来的17%的年回报可能帮助减轻了他们的痛苦。然而,他们应该注意未来可能的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HP.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于惠普的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:HPQ Ownership Breakdown December 13th 2024
纽交所:HPQ 所有权分解 2024年12月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HP?

机构所有权告诉我们惠普什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

HP already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HP's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

惠普已经在股票登记上有机构投资者。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这可以表明公司在投资社群中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好谨慎依赖来自机构投资者的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总有一种风险,他们可能正处在一个“拥挤的交易”中。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到惠普的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是还有更多。

big
NYSE:HPQ Earnings and Revenue Growth December 13th 2024
纽交所:惠普的营业收入与增长 2024年12月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. HP is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

机构投资者拥有该公司超过50%的股份,因此他们能够强有力地影响董事会的决策。惠普并不被对冲基金所拥有。根据我们的数据显示,最大股东是先锋集团,拥有13%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有12%和5.4%的流通股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记,我们可以看到前15大股东控制了50%的所有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数权益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of HP

惠普的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our information suggests that HP Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$73m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息显示,惠普的内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。由于公司规模如此巨大,我们不指望内部人士拥有大量股票。总的来说,他们拥有7300万美元的股票。可以说,最近的买卖同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众——包括散户投资者——在该公司拥有17%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这个群体并不一定能决定大局,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HP better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that HP is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...

考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地了解惠普,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 请注意,在我们的投资分析中,惠普显示出3个警示信号,其中1个令人担忧...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发