Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as RxSight, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RXST) Recent US$258m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as RxSight, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RXST) Recent US$258m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies RxSight's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 显著高的机构持有量意味着RxSight的股票价格对其交易行为敏感。
- 共有17位投资者在该公司拥有51%的控股权。
- 内部人士最近一直在买入
Every investor in RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXST) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每个在RxSight, Inc. (纳斯达克:RXST)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占75%,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 15% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 10% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell RxSight, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
上周,机构投资者的持有价值下降了15%。这一组投资者可能特别关注当前的损失,这使得股东的年度损失增加到了10%。机构或称为“流动性提供者”的投资者控制着大量资金,因此,这类投资者通常对股票价格的波动具有很大的影响力。因此,如果下行趋势持续,机构可能会面临卖出RxSight的压力,这可能对个人投资者产生负面影响。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RxSight.
在下图中,我们放大了RxSight的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RxSight?
机构所有权告诉我们关于RxSight什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in RxSight. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of RxSight, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在RxSight中拥有相当大的股份。这表明专业投资者之间有一定的可信度。但我们不能单靠这些事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,与其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,股价剧烈下跌也并不罕见。因此,查看RxSight过去的收益轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,记住还要考虑其他因素。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RxSight. Our data shows that RA Capital Management, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 6.9% and 5.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Ronald Kurtz directly holds 2.1% of the total shares outstanding.
机构投资者持有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以强有力地影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在RxSight的股份不多。我们的数据表明,RA资本管理公司是最大股东,拥有9.7%的流通股份。贝莱德公司和先锋集团分别是第二和第三大股东,分别持有6.9%和5.7%的流通股份。此外,公司的首席执行官罗纳德·库尔茨直接持有2.1%的流通股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到前17名股东控制了51%的所有权,这意味着没有单个股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of RxSight
RxSight的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in RxSight, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据表明,RxSight, Inc.的内部人士持有一些股份。 这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的统一是件好事。内部人士持有价值7500万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到内部人士如此投资是件好事。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有购买。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众——包括散户投资者——在公司中拥有11%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。 虽然这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以在公司政策上产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 9.7%, private equity firms could influence the RxSight board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
持有9.7%股份的股权投资公司可能会影响RxSight的董事会。一些人可能会喜欢这种情况,因为股权投资有时是活跃的,能够让管理层负责。但有时,股权投资也在出售,因为它们已经让公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for RxSight that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司不同群体的所有权是非常有意义的,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了一个关于RxSight的警告信号,您在这里投资之前应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。