share_log

Doctorglasses Chain Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300622) Surges 14%; Individual Investors Who Own 48% Shares Profited Along With Insiders

Doctorglasses Chain Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300622) Surges 14%; Individual Investors Who Own 48% Shares Profited Along With Insiders

博士眼镜链有限公司(深交所代码:300622)股价上涨14%;拥有48%股份的散户投资者与内部人士一起获利
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/13 14:58

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Doctorglasses ChainLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 7 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Doctorglasses ChainLtd is 44%
  • 在博士眼镜有限公司,个人投资者的相当数量的股份表明,他们在管理和业务策略上 collectively 拥有更大的发言权。
  • 前7大股东拥有公司的50%股份。
  • 在博士眼镜有限公司,内部持股比例为44%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Doctorglasses Chain Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300622), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 48% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制着博士眼镜股份有限公司(SZSE:300622),了解该公司的股权结构是非常重要的。个人投资者持有48%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体。换句话说,这个群体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最多的收益(或损失最多)。

While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 14% price gain, insiders also received a 44% cut.

虽然个人投资者是上周价格上涨14%后获得最多收益的群体,但内部人士也获得了44%的份额。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Doctorglasses ChainLtd, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨博士眼镜有限公司每种类型的所有者,首先是下面的图表。

big
SZSE:300622 Ownership Breakdown December 13th 2024
深交所:300622 所有权分布 2024年12月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Doctorglasses ChainLtd?

机构持股对博士眼镜有限公司意味着什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

We can see that Doctorglasses ChainLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Doctorglasses ChainLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到博士眼镜有限公司确实有机构投资者,他们持有该公司股票的一部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们看到了这只股票并且他们看好它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图退出一只股票,看到股票价格大幅下跌并不是不常见的。因此,查看博士眼镜有限公司过去的盈利轨迹(见下文)是值得的。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SZSE:300622 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 13th 2024
深交所:300622 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年12月13日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Doctorglasses ChainLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Louisa Fan with 22% of shares outstanding. Alexander Liu is the second largest shareholder owning 20% of common stock, and Feixiang (Hangzhou) Asset Management Co., Ltd. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

对冲基金在博士眼镜有限公司的股份不多。根据我们的数据,最大股东是首席执行官范露易莎,持有22%的流通股。刘亚历山大是第二大股东,持有20%的普通股,飞翔(杭州)资产管理有限公司持有约5.0%的公司股票。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步检查发现,公司的七大股东持有超过一半的股份,这表明大股东的利益在一定程度上与小股东的利益保持平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师情绪也可以实现这一点。虽然有一些分析师的研究覆盖,但公司的覆盖范围可能不广。因此,未来可能会获得更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Doctorglasses ChainLtd

博士眼镜有限公司的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Doctorglasses Chain Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥8.9b, and insiders have CN¥4.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看起来内部人士拥有博士眼镜有限公司相当大的一部分股份。它的市值只有89亿人民币,而内部人士在自己名下拥有价值40亿人民币的股票。这相当可观。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望访问这个免费的图表,查看内部人士最近的交易。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in Doctorglasses ChainLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众一般是个人投资者,他们持有博士眼镜有限公司48%的股份。虽然这一群体不一定能决定公司的重大事务,但它确实可以对公司的运营产生真实的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Doctorglasses ChainLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Doctorglasses ChainLtd (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体总是很重要。但要更好地理解博士眼镜链有限公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,我们发现了博士眼镜链有限公司的3个警告信号(其中1个我们不太喜欢!),在这里投资之前你应该注意这些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发