Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company
Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Celanese implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构对Celanese的巨额持股意味着他们对公司股价有重要影响。
- 51%的业务由前7大股东持有
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
If you want to know who really controls Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着Celanese公司(纽交所:CE),那么你需要查看其股份登记的组成情况。 持有公司最多股份的团体,准确来说,大约占89%,就是机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该团体将受益最多(如果出现下跌,则损失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
因为机构股东拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策通常会受到重视,尤其是对于个人投资者。因此,投资于公司的大量机构资金通常代表着对其未来的巨大信心。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Celanese.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Celanese的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Celanese?
机构持股能告诉我们什么关于Celanese?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that Celanese does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Celanese's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到Celanese确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司相当一部分的股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经关注了该股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果多个机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,看看下面Celanese的盈利历史是很有价值的。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Celanese. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 8.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此他们可以共同拥有显著的权力。对冲基金在Celanese的股份不多。公司的最大股东是先锋集团(The Vanguard Group, Inc.),持有12%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有10%和8.7%的流通股份。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进一步调查发现,前七大股东占注册股东的大约51%,这意味着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构的持有情况是判断和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。目前有合理数量的分析师在覆盖此股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有用。
Insider Ownership Of Celanese
Celanese的内部股东持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our information suggests that Celanese Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$31m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,塞拉尼斯公司的内部人士拥有不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士持有价值3100万美元的股份。绝对值可能比比例股份更重要。看到至少一些内部持股总是好的,但查询这些内部人士是否在出售股份可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Celanese. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众,通常是个人投资者,持有塞拉尼斯10%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能够决定,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Celanese you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
我发现查看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如:我们发现了 3 个针对Celanese的警告信号,你应该注意,其中一个可能很严重。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。