Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After UiPath Inc.'s (NYSE:PATH) Latest 5.4% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After UiPath Inc.'s (NYSE:PATH) Latest 5.4% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in UiPath implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- 21% of UiPath is held by insiders
- 机构在UiPath的大量持股意味着他们对公司股票价格有显著影响。
- 51%的业务由前11名股东持有。
- 21%的UiPath股份由内部人士持有。
Every investor in UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 57% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每个投资者在UiPath Inc.(纽交所:PATH)都应该了解最强大的股东群体。机构以57%的股份拥有公司最多的股票。因此,这个群体在股票上涨时最有可能获益(或者在出现下跌时损失最多)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 5.4% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 45% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in UiPath's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
在上周公司股价下跌5.4%后,机构投资者承受了最大的损失。最近的亏损,加上股东一年内45%的亏损,可能不会让这组投资者感到满意。机构常被称为“市场推动者”,在影响任何股票的价格动态方面拥有重要的力量。因此,如果UiPath的股价持续疲软,机构投资者可能会感到被迫卖出该股票,这对于个人投资者来说可能并不理想。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of UiPath.
在下面的图表中,我们详细观察UiPath的不同持股群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UiPath?
机构持股告诉我们关于UiPath什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that UiPath does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at UiPath's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到UiPath确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当一部分。这可以表明公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉。然而,最好还是小心依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时候也会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,查看下面UiPath的盈利历史是很值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in UiPath. The company's CEO Daniel Dines is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. With 8.4% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。 对冲基金在UiPath中的持股不多。 公司的首席执行官丹尼尔·迪尼斯是最大股东,持有20%的流通股份。 先锋集团和日兴资产管理公司分别是第二和第三大股东,持有8.4%和5.2%的流通股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到51%的股份由前11大股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
虽然研究一家公司机构的所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的看法也同样重要,以了解市场的动态。很多分析师关注这只股票,因此查看他们的预测也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of UiPath
UiPath的内幕持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终算作内部人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of UiPath Inc.. Insiders own US$1.6b worth of shares in the US$7.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有UiPath Inc.相当合理的股份。内部人士持有价值16亿美金的股份,而这家公司的市值为77亿美金。这相当重要。看到这种投资水平很不错。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in UiPath. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有UiPath 22%的股份。尽管这个持有比例相当可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不一致,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with UiPath , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。 例如,始终存在的投资风险。 我们已识别出UiPath的一个警告信号,理解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。