share_log

Institutions Along With Public Companies Who Hold Considerable Shares InHUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) Come Under Pressure; Lose 11% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Public Companies Who Hold Considerable Shares InHUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) Come Under Pressure; Lose 11% of Holdings Value

机构和持有HUYA Inc.(纽交所:HUYA)大量股份的上市公司受到压力;损失了11%的持有价值
Simply Wall St ·  12/16 18:06

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • HUYA's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Tencent Holdings Limited with a 66% stake
  • Institutions own 18% of HUYA
  • 虎牙的公众公司持有情况表明,关键决策受到大型股东的影响。
  • 该公司的最大股东是腾讯控股,持股比例为66%。
  • 机构持有18%的虎牙股份。

A look at the shareholders of HUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is public companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看虎牙(纽交所代码:HUYA)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。持有公司最多股份的群体,准确地说,是公众公司,约占66%。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

While the holdings of public companies took a hit after last week's 11% price drop, institutions with their 18% holdings also suffered.

虽然公共公司的持股在上周价格下跌11%后受到冲击,但持有18%股份的机构也遭受了损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HUYA.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于虎牙的不同持股群体。

big
NYSE:HUYA Ownership Breakdown December 16th 2024
纽交所:虎牙持股结构 2024年12月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HUYA?

机构持股告诉我们关于虎牙什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

We can see that HUYA does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of HUYA, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到虎牙确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这在专业投资者中表明了一些可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看虎牙过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:HUYA Earnings and Revenue Growth December 16th 2024
纽交所:虎牙 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年12月16日

HUYA is not owned by hedge funds. Tencent Holdings Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 66% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.7% and 2.3% of the stock.

虎牙并不被对冲基金持有。腾讯控股目前是最大的股东,持有66%的流通股。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有控股权。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约3.7%和2.3%的股票。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解市场趋势同样也是有意义的。现在有相当多的分析师关注这只股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of HUYA

虎牙的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。

Our information suggests that HUYA Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It has a market capitalization of just US$708m, and the board has only US$2.1m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我们的信息显示虎牙的内部人士拥有不足1%的股份。它的市值仅为70800万美元,董事会仅拥有价值210万美元的股票。许多人倾向于看到拥有更大股份的董事会。接下来的一个好步骤可能是查看这份关于内部买入和卖出的免费总结。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over HUYA. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众拥有16%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对虎牙有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能左右决策,但确实可以对公司的运营产生真正的影响。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 66% of HUYA stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前拥有虎牙股份的66%。虽然很难确切说,但这表明他们有交织的业务利益。这可能是一种战略性股份,因此值得关注这一领域的所有权变化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HUYA better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with HUYA .

考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体总是值得的。但是要更好地理解虎牙,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该关注我们发现的虎牙的一个警告信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发