NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 65% of the Company
NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 65% of the Company
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies NIKE's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders own 21% of NIKE
- 显著较高的机构持股意味着耐克的股价对他们的交易行为很敏感
- 共有14位投资者在公司中拥有大多数股份,持股比例为50%
- 内部人士持有耐克21%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of NIKE, Inc. (NYSE:NKE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 65% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制耐克公司(纽交所:NKE),重要的是要理解该业务的股权结构。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占65%,是机构。换句话说,这个群体从对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到他们掌握的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有重要影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,投资于公司的大部分机构资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of NIKE, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地探讨耐克每种类型的所有者,从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NIKE?
机构所有权告诉我们关于耐克什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
NIKE already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NIKE, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
耐克已经在股份登记上有机构投资者。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能会错。 如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,看到股价大幅下跌并不少见。因此,查看耐克过去的盈利趋势是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in NIKE. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Philip Knight (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 18% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此它们可以共同发挥重要的影响力。我们注意到对耐克的对冲基金投资并不显著。根据我们的数据,我们推测最大的股东是菲利普·奈特(同时担任首席执行官),持有18%的流通股份。一般来说,内部人士持有公司大量股份被视为好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人士扮演关键股东的角色。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有7.4%和6.2%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔细地查看我们的持股数据表明,前14位股东的合计持股比例为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解市场趋势同样也是有意义的。现在有相当多的分析师关注这只股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of NIKE
耐克的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in NIKE, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$115b, and insiders have US$24b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息表明,内部人士在耐克公司持有大量股份。公司的市值只有1150亿美元,而内部人士自己名下的股份价值240亿美元。这相当可观。看到这种投资水平令人欣慰。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否最近有购买。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in NIKE. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,在耐克公司持有14%的股份。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NIKE better, we need to consider many other factors.
始终值得思考拥有公司股票的不同群体。但要更好地理解耐克,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问这张互动图表,查看过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。