share_log

Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 88% of the Company

Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 88% of the Company

阿维斯塔公司(纽交所:AVA)主要由拥有88%股份的机构股东控制。
Simply Wall St ·  12/17 00:21

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Avista's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 显著高的机构持有比例意味着阿维斯塔的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 共有8位投资者在公司中占有多数股权,持有52%的股份。
  • 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 88% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制着阿维斯塔公司(纽交所:AVA),理解业务的所有权结构至关重要。持有最大份额的是机构,持有88%的股份。换句话说,该群体从对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

因为机构股东拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策通常会受到重视,尤其是对于个人投资者。因此,投资于公司的大量机构资金通常代表着对其未来的巨大信心。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Avista.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了阿维斯塔的不同持股群体。

big
NYSE:AVA Ownership Breakdown December 16th 2024
纽交所:AVA 持股分布 2024年12月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avista?

机构持股告诉我们关于阿维斯塔什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

Avista already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Avista's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

阿维斯塔的股权登记中已经有机构存在。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能会错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面阿维斯塔的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:AVA Earnings and Revenue Growth December 16th 2024
纽交所:阿维斯塔的收益和营业收入增长 2024年12月16日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Avista. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 5.9% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以共同强有力地影响董事会决策。我们注意到对阿维斯塔并没有重要投资的对冲基金。贝莱德目前是最大股东,持有19%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约13%和5.9%的股票。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的挖掘,发现前8大股东大致占据了52%的注册股份,暗示着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了各自的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解市场趋势同样也是有意义的。现在有相当多的分析师关注这只股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Avista

阿维斯塔的内部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Avista Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$26m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有阿维斯塔公司的股份不足1%。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士持有价值2600万美元的股票。绝对值可能比比例股权更重要。看到至少一些内部人士持股总是好的,但值得检查那些内部人士是否在出售。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Avista. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众,通常是个人投资者,持有阿维斯塔11%的股份。虽然这一群体不能决定一切,但他们确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Avista (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现了解谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正深入了解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。考虑到投资风险这一始终存在的阴影,我们已识别出阿维斯塔的三个警告信号(至少有一个是显著的),理解它们应该是你投资过程中不可或缺的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发