Following Recent Decline, Sangfor Technologies Inc.'s (SZSE:300454) Top Shareholder CEO Chaoxi He Sees Holdings Value Drop by 3.0%
Following Recent Decline, Sangfor Technologies Inc.'s (SZSE:300454) Top Shareholder CEO Chaoxi He Sees Holdings Value Drop by 3.0%
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Sangfor Technologies' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Institutions own 15% of Sangfor Technologies
- 深信服的显著内部持股表明对公司扩展的固有利益
- 共有5位投资者在公司中拥有51%的控股权。
- 机构持有深信服15%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sangfor Technologies Inc. (SZSE:300454), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 46% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了深信服(SZSE:300454),了解公司的所有权结构非常重要。由于持有46%的股份,个人内部人士拥有公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大利益(或者在市场下滑时损失最大)。
As market cap fell to CN¥26b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
上周市值降至260亿人民币,内部人士面临的损失比公司的其他股东群体要高。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sangfor Technologies, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨一下深信服的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sangfor Technologies?
机构持股对深信服意味着什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that Sangfor Technologies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Sangfor Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到深信服确实有机构投资者,且他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持谨慎。他们有时也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得查看深信服的收益历史。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sangfor Technologies. The company's CEO Chaoxi He is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 8.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders.
我们注意到对深信服的对冲基金并没有进行有意义的投资。公司的首席执行官何超熙是最大的股东,持有20%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有18%和8.1%的流通股。请注意,前三大股东中有两个也是高级关键执行官和董事会成员,这再次表明公司内部人士拥有显著的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company's shares which essentially means that there is concentrated ownership amongst the top shareholders, most of whom happen to be insiders!
经过进一步调查,我们发现前五大股东控制了公司超过一半的股份,这基本上意味着前大股东之间存在集中持股,大多数股东恰好是内部人士!
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一种良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师覆盖此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Sangfor Technologies
深信服的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Sangfor Technologies Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥12b stake in this CN¥26b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在深信服中持有大量股份。看到内部人士在这个市值260亿人民币的业务中拥有高达120亿人民币的持股真是非常有趣。看到这样的投资水平令人满意。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sangfor Technologies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众的拥有比例为39%,大多数由个体投资者组成,对深信服有一定的影响力。尽管这种拥有比例相当可观,但如果决策不符合其他大股东的意见,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Sangfor Technologies (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
我发现查看到底是谁拥有一家公司的情况非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,我们已经确定了深信服的3个警告信号(1个不能忽视),你应该注意这些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。