share_log

Private Companies Are MMG Limited's (HKG:1208) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$3.5b

Private Companies Are MMG Limited's (HKG:1208) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$3.5b

私营公司是五矿资源(HKG:1208)的最大股东,在市值下降35亿港元后受到影响。
Simply Wall St ·  12/16 21:05

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in MMG indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Institutions own 10% of MMG
  • 私人公司在五矿资源的巨大持股表明,他们在管理和业务策略上 collectively 具有更大的话语权。
  • 共有2位投资者在公司中拥有50%的多数股权
  • 机构持有五矿资源10%的股份。

Every investor in MMG Limited (HKG:1208) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位在五矿资源有限公司(HKG:1208)的投资者都应意识到最强大的股东群体。持有该公司最多股份的群体,大约占48%,是私人公司。换句话说,该群体在投资于该公司时,最有可能获得最大收益(或承受最大损失)。

As market cap fell to HK$31b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

上周市值下降至310亿港元,私营企业面临的损失是公司其他股东集团中最高的。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of MMG, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地探讨MMG的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
SEHK:1208 Ownership Breakdown December 17th 2024
SEHK:1208 所有权拆分 2024年12月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MMG?

机构所有权告诉我们关于MMG什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

MMG already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at MMG's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

MMG的股东名册上已经有机构的存在。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已对该股票进行了研究,并表示喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会快速下跌。因此,值得关注一下MMG的盈利历史。未来才是真正重要的。

big
SEHK:1208 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 17th 2024
港交所:1208 盈利与营业收入增长 2024年12月17日

MMG is not owned by hedge funds. China Minmetals Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.2% and 1.2% of the stock.

五矿资源并不被对冲基金持有。中国五矿集团公司目前是最大的股东,持有48%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约2.2%和1.2%的股票。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究显示,前两大股东通过其50%的股份在公司中拥有相当数量的所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的机构持股可以为你的研究增值,同时研究分析师的建议也是一个很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。 目前有相当数量的分析师覆盖该股票,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of MMG

五矿资源的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of MMG Limited in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own HK$2.4m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据显示,内部人员以个人名义拥有MMG Limited不到1%的股份。然而,内部人员可能通过更复杂的结构间接持有股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的持股也可以在董事会和股东之间创建一致性。在这种情况下,内部人员拥有价值240万港元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股份是一件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人员是否有在购买。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

With a 42% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MMG. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

大众拥有42%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对MMG有一定的影响力。尽管这个持股比例可能不足以使政策决定偏向他们,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 48%, of the MMG stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

似乎私人公司持有五矿资源48%的股票。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查一下这些私人公司的所有者。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过一个独立的私人公司对一家上市公司拥有股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with MMG (including 1 which is significant) .

我发现了解一家公司到底由谁拥有是非常有趣的。但要真正获得深入的见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们发现的五矿资源的两个警示信号(包括一个重要的信号)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发