Calumet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLMT) Market Cap Dropped US$115m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 44% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Calumet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLMT) Market Cap Dropped US$115m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 44% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Key Insights
关键洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Calumet indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 散户投资者在Calumet的巨大持股表明,他们在管理和业务策略上有更大的发言权。
- 前20名股东持有50%的业务
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Calumet, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制Calumet, Inc. (纳斯达克:CLMT),首先需要理解该业务的股权结构。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占44%,是散户投资者。也就是说,如果股票上涨,他们将获得最大的收益(如果出现下跌,他们将损失最多)。
While institutions who own 24% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$1.8b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
虽然拥有24%的机构在市值上周降至18亿美元后受到压力,但零售投资者遭受了最大损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Calumet.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于卡卢美特的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Calumet?
机构所有权告诉我们关于卡卢美特的信息是什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
We can see that Calumet does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Calumet, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到卡卢美特确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师对该股票进行了研究并且看好它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两家大型机构投资者试图同时出售某只股票,股价大幅下跌并不少见。因此,查看卡卢美特过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 5.0% of Calumet. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Heritage Group with 16% of shares outstanding. With 8.1% and 6.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wasserstein & Co., L.P. and Adams Asset Advisors LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们的数据表明,对冲基金持有Calumet 5.0%的股份。这很有趣,因为对冲基金通常相当活跃且具有激进性。许多基金寻找能够推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到,最大的股东是The Heritage Group,持有16%的流通股份。Wasserstein & Co., L.P.和Adams Asset Advisors LLC分别持有8.1%和6.1%的流通股份,位列第二和第三大股东。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册中,我们可以看到前20名股东控制了50%的持股,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数的持股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Calumet
Calumet的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Calumet, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$50m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以报告,内部人士确实持有Calumet, Inc.的股票。这是一家大公司,因此看到这样的对齐程度是很好的。内部人士持有价值5000万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到内部人士进行这样的投资是件好事。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有在买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Calumet. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有Calumet 44%的股份。虽然这一群体不一定能够决定一切,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 8.1%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
凭借8.1%的股权,股权投资公司有能力在价值创造的基础上参与塑造企业的策略。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为股权投资有时是激进派,要求管理层负责。但有时,股权投资会选择退出,将公司公开上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Calumet stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起来,私营公司持有Calumet股票的16%。私营公司可能是相关方。有时内部人士是通过持有私营公司的股份,而非以个人身份,来对一家上市公司产生利益。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是进一步研究的一个领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Calumet has 4 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
我觉得研究一个公司的具体所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例——Calumet有4个警告信号(还有1个让我们感到不安的信号),我们认为你应该了解这些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。