share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Genpact (NYSE:G) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Genpact (NYSE:G) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

这四项指标表明简伯特(纽交所:G)在合理使用债务。
Simply Wall St ·  12/17 19:47

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Genpact Limited (NYSE:G) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦·巴菲特曾说:‘波动性远非与风险同义词。’ 因此,当你考虑任何特定股票的风险时,考虑债务可能是显而易见的,因为过多的债务可以使公司陷入困境。 我们可以看到简伯特有限公司(纽交所:G)确实在其业务中使用了债务。 但真正的问题是这些债务是否使公司变得风险较大。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务带来风险?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

当企业无法轻松履行债务和其他负债时,这些责任就变得有风险,无论是通过自由现金流还是通过以吸引人的价格筹集资金。 资本主义的一个重要组成部分是‘创造性破坏’的过程,其中失败的企业被他们的银行毫不留情地清算。 然而,较为常见(但仍然痛苦)的情况是,它必须以低价格筹集新的股权资本,从而永久性地稀释股东的权益。 当然,许多公司使用债务来资助增长,而没有任何负面后果。 当我们检查债务水平时,我们首先同时考虑现金和债务水平。

What Is Genpact's Debt?

简伯特的债务是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Genpact had US$1.63b of debt, an increase on US$1.31b, over one year. However, it also had US$1.03b in cash, and so its net debt is US$599.4m.

您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但它显示截至2024年9月,简伯特的债务为16.3亿美元,比13.1亿美元增加。 然而,它也有10.3亿美元现金,因此其净债务为59940万美元。

big
NYSE:G Debt to Equity History December 17th 2024
纽交所:G 债务与股本历史 2024年12月17日

How Strong Is Genpact's Balance Sheet?

简伯特的资产负债表有多强?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Genpact had liabilities of US$1.29b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.64b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.03b in cash and US$1.21b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$688.8m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

我们从最新的资产负债表中看到,简伯特的短期负债为126亿美元,长期负债为16.4亿美元。对此,它有10.3亿美元的现金和12.1亿美元的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,其负债总额比现金和短期应收账款的总和多出6880万美元。

Of course, Genpact has a market capitalization of US$7.88b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

当然,简伯特的市值为78.8亿美元,因此这些负债可能是可控的。但负债的确足够,未来我们会建议股东继续关注资产负债表。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我们通过查看公司的净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比例来衡量公司相对于其收益能力的债务负担,以及计算其息税前利润(EBIT)覆盖利息支出的能力(利息覆盖率)。因此,我们在考虑收益时同时考虑了折旧与摊销费用及不考虑这些费用的情况。

Genpact has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.78. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 13.7 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. The good news is that Genpact has increased its EBIT by 3.6% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Genpact's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

简伯特的净债务与EBITDA的比率仅为0.78。而其EBIT能覆盖利息费用多达13.7倍。因此,你可以说它的债务对它的威胁就像大象对老鼠的威胁一样。好消息是,简伯特在过去12个月内将其EBIT提高了3.6%,这应该能缓解对债务偿还的担忧。分析债务时,资产负债表显然是关注的重点。但未来盈利,尤其是,决定了简伯特今后维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你专注于未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,展示分析师的利润预测。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Genpact recorded free cash flow worth 76% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,一家公司只能用现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,合理的步骤是查看那部分EBIT与实际自由现金流的比率。在最近的三年中,简伯特的自由现金流占其EBIT的76%,这在正常范围内,因为自由现金流不包括利息和税收。这笔现金意味着它可以在需要时减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Genpact's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Genpact's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Genpact is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...

高兴的是,简伯特令人印象深刻的利息保障倍数意味着它在债务方面处于有利地位。而且好消息并不仅止于此,因为它将EBIT转换为自由现金流的能力进一步支持了这一印象!从更广泛的角度来看,我们认为简伯特对债务的使用似乎相当合理,我们对此并不担心。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提高股本回报。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是重点关注的领域。然而,投资风险并不全在资产负债表中,远非如此。请注意,简伯特在我们的投资分析中显示出2个警告信号,其中1个令我们感到不太舒服...

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

无论最终结果如何,有时候更容易关注那些根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费获取一份净债务为零的成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发