Institutional Investors Are Similarweb Ltd.'s (NYSE:SMWB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Similarweb Ltd.'s (NYSE:SMWB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Similarweb's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Insider ownership in Similarweb is 25%
- 显著的高机构持股意味着Similarweb的股价对他们的交易行为敏感。
- 共有5位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,持股比例为53%
- Similarweb的内部持股为25%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Similarweb Ltd. (NYSE:SMWB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了Similarweb Ltd.(纽交所:SMWB),了解企业的股权结构非常重要。持有最大份额的是机构,持股比例为35%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该团体将获得最大利益(或者在下跌时承受最大的损失)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.0b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 164%.
上周,机构投资者在公司市值达到10亿美元后受益最多。 上周的收益进一步提升了股东的一年回报,目前为164%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Similarweb.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Similarweb的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Similarweb?
机构持股对Similarweb意味着什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
We can see that Similarweb does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Similarweb's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到Similarweb确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因机构有时也会进行错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Similarweb的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的故事。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Similarweb. The company's largest shareholder is Joshua Alliance, with ownership of 16%. The second and third largest shareholders are Viola Group and Prosus Ventures N.V., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 14%. Furthermore, CEO Or Offer is the owner of 4.8% of the company's shares.
我们注意到对Similarweb没有显著投资的对冲基金。该公司的最大股东是Joshua Alliance,持股16%。第二和第三大股东分别是Viola Group和Prosus Ventures N.V.,均持有14%的股份。此外,首席执行官Or Offer持有公司4.8%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了让我们的研究更加有趣,我们发现前5大股东控制了公司超过一半的股份,这意味着这一群体在公司的决策中具有相当大的影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Similarweb
Similarweb的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然对内部人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层运行业务,但CEO会向董事会报告,即使他或她是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Similarweb Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.0b, and insiders have US$265m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有Similarweb Ltd.相当比例的股份。该公司的市值仅为10亿美元,内部人士名下持有价值26500万美元的股份。这相当显著。大多数人会说这显示了与股东之间良好的对齐,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众,包括散户投资者,拥有该公司13%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这一群体未必能主导决策,但他们确实可以对公司的运行产生真实影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 27%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
拥有27%的股份,股权投资公司在塑造企业策略方面可以发挥作用,重点放在价值创造上。对于某些投资者而言,这可能是一个鼓励,因为股权投资公司有时能够推动策略,使市场认识到公司的价值。另一方面,那些持有者可能在公司上市后会退出投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Similarweb that you should be aware of before investing here.
我发现了解到底谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现Similarweb有1个警告信号,你在这里投资之前应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。