Returns On Capital Are Showing Encouraging Signs At New York Times (NYSE:NYT)
Returns On Capital Are Showing Encouraging Signs At New York Times (NYSE:NYT)
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Speaking of which, we noticed some great changes in New York Times' (NYSE:NYT) returns on capital, so let's have a look.
寻找具有大幅增长潜力的企业并不容易,但是如果我们看一些关键的财务指标,这是可能的。首先,我们希望确定不断增长的已动用资本回报率(ROCE),然后确定不断增加的资本使用基础。如果你看到这一点,这通常意味着它是一家拥有良好商业模式和大量盈利再投资机会的公司。说到这里,我们注意到《纽约时报》(纽约证券交易所代码:NYT)的资本回报率发生了一些重大变化,所以让我们来看看吧。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
了解已动用资本回报率 (ROCE)
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on New York Times is:
对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE是衡量公司年度税前利润(其回报率)的指标,相对于该业务使用的资本。《纽约时报》的计算公式为:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益(EBIT)÷(总资产-流动负债)
0.16 = US$347m ÷ (US$2.8b - US$590m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.16 = 3.47亿美元 ÷(28亿美元至5.9亿美元)(基于截至2024年9月的过去十二个月)。
Therefore, New York Times has an ROCE of 16%. In absolute terms, that's a satisfactory return, but compared to the Media industry average of 9.6% it's much better.
因此,《纽约时报》的投资回报率为16%。从绝对值来看,这是一个令人满意的回报,但与媒体行业的平均水平9.6%相比,回报要好得多。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for New York Times compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for New York Times .
上面你可以看到《纽约时报》当前的投资回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比如何,但从过去可以看出来的只有那么多。如果您有兴趣,可以在我们的《纽约时报》免费分析师报告中查看分析师的预测。
So How Is New York Times' ROCE Trending?
那么《纽约时报》的ROCE趋势如何?
Investors would be pleased with what's happening at New York Times. The data shows that returns on capital have increased substantially over the last five years to 16%. The amount of capital employed has increased too, by 36%. The increasing returns on a growing amount of capital is common amongst multi-baggers and that's why we're impressed.
投资者会对《纽约时报》发生的事情感到满意。数据显示,在过去五年中,资本回报率大幅上升至16%。使用的资本金额也增加了36%。越来越多的资本所带来的回报率不断增加在多袋公司中很常见,这就是为什么我们印象深刻的原因。
The Bottom Line
底线
In summary, it's great to see that New York Times can compound returns by consistently reinvesting capital at increasing rates of return, because these are some of the key ingredients of those highly sought after multi-baggers. And with a respectable 77% awarded to those who held the stock over the last five years, you could argue that these developments are starting to get the attention they deserve. So given the stock has proven it has promising trends, it's worth researching the company further to see if these trends are likely to persist.
总而言之,很高兴看到《纽约时报》能够通过持续地以更高的回报率进行资本再投资来增加回报,因为这些是那些备受追捧的多袋子公司的一些关键要素。而且,在过去五年中持有该股票的人将获得可观的77%的奖励,你可以说这些发展已开始得到应有的关注。因此,鉴于该股已证明其趋势令人鼓舞,值得进一步研究该公司,看看这些趋势是否可能持续下去。
Before jumping to any conclusions though, we need to know what value we're getting for the current share price. That's where you can check out our FREE intrinsic value estimation for NYT that compares the share price and estimated value.
但是,在得出任何结论之前,我们需要知道当前股价将获得什么价值。在这里,您可以查看我们对纽约时报的免费内在价值估算,该估算值比较了股价和估计价值。
While New York Times may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
尽管《纽约时报》目前可能无法获得最高的回报,但我们编制了一份目前股本回报率超过25%的公司名单。在这里查看这个免费清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。