Earnings Growth of 1.0% Over 3 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for Lear (NYSE:LEA) Shareholders
Earnings Growth of 1.0% Over 3 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for Lear (NYSE:LEA) Shareholders
As an investor its worth striving to ensure your overall portfolio beats the market average. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. We regret to report that long term Lear Corporation (NYSE:LEA) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 45% in three years, versus a market return of about 28%. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 33% in a year. The falls have accelerated recently, with the share price down 12% in the last three months.
作为投资者,努力确保您的整体投资组合超越市场平均水平是值得的。但股票选择的风险在于,您可能会购买表现不佳的公司。我们遗憾地报告,长期持有李尔公司(纽交所:LEA)股票的股东经历了这样的情况,股价在三年内下跌了45%,而市场回报约为28%。最近的消息更令人无法安慰,股价在一年内下跌了33%。最近股价下跌的速度加快,在过去三个月内股价下跌了12%。
Given the past week has been tough on shareholders, let's investigate the fundamentals and see what we can learn.
鉴于过去一周对股东来说很艰难,让我们调查一下基本面,看看我们能学到什么。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
虽然市场是一种强大的定价机制,但股价反映的是投资者情绪,而不仅仅是基础业务表现。查看公司股价与每股收益(EPS)之间的互动,可以检视市场情绪是如何随时间而变化的。
During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, Lear actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 3.0% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.
在这三年股价下跌的不幸期间,李尔的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年改善了3.0%。考虑到股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑在此期间,EPS并不是商业表现的良好指标(可能由于一次性的损失或收益)。或者,公司在过去被过于炒作,因此其增长令人失望。
It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. However, taking a look at other business metrics might shed a bit more light on the share price action.
在我们看来,市场可能在三年前对增长过于乐观。然而,查看其他业务指标可能会对股价走势提供更多的启示。
We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 8.3% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Lear more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.
我们注意到,在三年内,营业收入实际上以8.3%的年增长率增长,因此这似乎不是卖出股份的理由。此次分析只是例行公事,但可能值得更仔细研究李尔,因为有时股票的下跌并不公平。这可能提供了一个机会。
The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
下面的图像显示了收益和营业收入随时间的变化情况(如果点击图像,可以看到更详细的信息)。
Lear is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. Given we have quite a good number of analyst forecasts, it might be well worth checking out this free chart depicting consensus estimates.
李尔在投资者中很知名,很多聪明的分析师试图预测未来的利润水平。鉴于我们有相当多的分析师预测,查看这张描绘共识估计的免费图表可能非常值得。
What About Dividends?
关于分红派息的问题
When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Lear, it has a TSR of -40% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
在考虑投资回报时,重要的是考虑总股东回报(TSR)与股价回报之间的区别。TSR是一种回报计算,考虑了现金分红的价值(假设任何收到的分红都是再投资的)以及任何折扣融资和分拆的计算价值。因此,对于那些支付丰厚分红的公司,TSR往往远高于股价回报。就李尔而言,过去3年它的TSR为-40%。这超过了我们之前提到的股价回报。而且毫无疑问,分红支付在很大程度上解释了这一差异!
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
Lear shareholders are down 31% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 28%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 5% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example - Lear has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
李尔的股东今年下跌了31%(即使包括分红派息),但市场本身上涨了28%。即使是表现良好的股票,有时也会下跌,但我们希望在对业务产生浓厚兴趣之前,看到其基本指标的改善。很遗憾,去年的表现终结了一段糟糕的运行,股东在过去五年中面临的总亏损为每年5%。一般来说,长期股价疲软可能是一个坏兆头,尽管逆向投资者可能希望通过研究这只股票来期待反弹。虽然考虑市场条件对股价的不同影响是非常值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,风险 - 我们认为李尔有2个警告信号,您应该注意。
Of course Lear may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.
当然,李尔可能不是最适合买入的股票。因此,您可能希望查看这份免费的成长股票集合。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文中引用的市场回报反映了当前在美国交易所上市股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。