Institutional Owners May Ignore WesBanco, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:WSBC) Recent US$73m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore WesBanco, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:WSBC) Recent US$73m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
关键见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, WesBanco's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,WesBanco的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 50% 的业务由前 17 名股东持有
- 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现
A look at the shareholders of WesBanco, Inc. (NASDAQ:WSBC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看WesBanco, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:WSBC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。机构拥有69%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.1% last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
投资亏损是任何股东都不喜欢的事情,更不用说上周持股价值下降3.1%的机构投资者了。但是,17%的股东一年回报率可能减轻了打击。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about WesBanco.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于WesBanco的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WesBanco?
关于WesBanco,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常用指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购包含在相关基准指数中的大型公司。
We can see that WesBanco does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of WesBanco, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,WesBanco确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下WesBanco过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. WesBanco is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。WesBanco 不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已发行股份为9.0%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约7.9%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有6.1%的所有权。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细观察我们的所有权数据后发现,前17名股东的总所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个股东占多数。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。有合理数量的分析师报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of WesBanco
WesBanco 的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难要求董事会对决策负责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in WesBanco, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$66m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有WesBanco, Inc.的部分股份。内部人士持有价值6600万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in WesBanco. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有WesBanco28%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with WesBanco .
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在WesBanco上发现的1个警告标志。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。