Private Companies Invested in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. (SHSE:688259) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥380m Market Cap Decline
Private Companies Invested in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. (SHSE:688259) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥380m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
关键洞察
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Triductor Technology (Suzhou) is 25%
- 在三导技术(苏州)中,私营企业的相当大股份表明它们在管理和业务策略方面拥有更大的发言权。
- 前四大股东持有52%的股份。
- Triductor科技(苏州)的机构持股比例为25%。
A look at the shareholders of Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. (SHSE:688259) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
观察Triductor科技(苏州)有限公司(SHSE:688259)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,私营公司在该公司的股份占比最大,达到37%。换句话说,该集团面临最大收益潜力(或损失风险)。
As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥380m.
因此,私营企业作为一个整体在上周遭受了最高的损失,市值下降了38000万人民币。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Triductor Technology (Suzhou).
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于Triductor Technology(苏州)的不同股东群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Triductor Technology (Suzhou)?
机构持股告诉我们关于Triductor Technology(苏州)的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Triductor Technology (Suzhou). This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Triductor Technology (Suzhou)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Triductor Technology (Suzhou). This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Triductor Technology (Suzhou)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Triductor Technology (Suzhou) is not owned by hedge funds. Chongqing Chuangruiying Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 28% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 14% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
三端科技(苏州)并不被对冲基金持有。 重庆创瑞盈企业管理有限公司目前是最大的股东,持有28%的流通股。 作为参考,第二大股东持有大约14%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.0%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我们的研究还揭示了一个事实,即公司约52%的股份由前四大股东控制,这表明这些股东在业务上具有重要影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
虽然研究公司的机构持股能为您的研究增值,但研究分析师的建议也是一种良好的做法,可以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们目前没有发现任何分析师对该股票的覆盖,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Triductor Technology (Suzhou)
Triductor科技(苏州)的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc. in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It seems the board members have no more than CN¥2.7m worth of shares in the CN¥4.1b company. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们的数据显示,内部人士在他们自己名下持有的Triductor Technology (Suzhou) Inc.的股份不足1%。然而,内部人士可能通过更复杂的结构间接持有股份。看起来董事会成员在这家市值41亿元的公司中持有的股份不超过270万人民币。许多人倾向于更喜欢看到持股更大的董事会。接下来的一个好步骤可能是查看这份内部人士买入和卖出的免费总结。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众,包括散户投资者,持有该公司32%的股份,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 6.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
持有6.0%的股权,股权投资公司有机会参与塑造企业策略,重点关注价值创造。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时能够推动有助于市场认识到公司价值的策略。另一方面,这些持有者可能在公司上市后退出投资。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 37%, of the Triductor Technology (Suzhou) stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私营公司拥有37%的三导科技(苏州)股票。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有私营公司的股份而非以个人身份对上市公司有利益。在得出广泛的结论时很困难,但值得注意的是,这是一个进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Triductor Technology (Suzhou) you should be aware of, and 1 of them doesn't sit too well with us.
我觉得了解一家公司究竟由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。相关例子:我们发现三导科技(苏州)有3个警告信号你需要注意,其中1个让我们感到不太舒适。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最好的股票购买选择。因此,请查看这个有趣公司的免费列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。