share_log

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc. (SHSE:688312) CEO Yan Liu's Holdings Dropped 9.9% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc. (SHSE:688312) CEO Yan Liu's Holdings Dropped 9.9% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

燕麦科技(SHSE:688312)CEO刘燕的持股价值因最近的回调下降了9.9%。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/19 08:14

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 2 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Shenzhen Yanmade Technology is 17%
  • 内部人士似乎对燕麦科技的增长有切身利益,正如他们的可观持股所示。
  • 前两大股东持有公司52%的股份
  • 燕麦科技的机构持股为17%。

If you want to know who really controls Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc. (SHSE:688312), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 47% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制燕麦科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688312),那么你必须查看其股份登记的组成。 内部人士以47%的股权拥有该公司的最大股份。 换句话说,集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 9.9%.

上周,内部人士承受了最大的损失,因为股票下跌了9.9%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于燕麦科技的不同所有权集团。

big
SHSE:688312 Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
SHSE:688312 所有权分解 2024年12月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Yanmade Technology?

机构所有权告诉我们关于燕麦科技什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

燕麦科技已经在股东登记上拥有机构投资者。事实上,他们在公司的股份相当可观。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经关注了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会出错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不少见。因此,值得检查燕麦科技过去的盈利轨迹(见下文)。当然,还要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SHSE:688312 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
SHSE:688312 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年12月19日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Yanmade Technology. The company's CEO Yan Liu is the largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.0% and 2.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对冲基金在燕麦科技的股份不多。公司CEO刘彦是最大股东,持有47%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有5.0%和2.7%的流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两大股东在公司中拥有大多数股权,这意味着他们有足够的权力影响公司的决策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。该股票有一些分析师覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它仍然可能变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology

燕麦科技的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.6b, and insiders have CN¥2.2b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有燕麦科技一个合理的股份比例。它的市值仅为46亿人民币,内部人士持有价值22亿人民币的股票。看到内部人士如此投资于业务真是太好了。检查一下这些内部人士最近是否有在买入,可能会很值得。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众,包括零售投资者,在公司的股份中拥有29%的股份,因此无法轻易被忽视。虽然这群人不一定能做主,但他们确实可以对公司的运行产生实质性的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.2%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司6.2%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份,而不是以个人身份的方式,对一家上市公司有利益。虽然很难做出广泛的结论,但值得注意的是这是一个进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Yanmade Technology (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我发现了解一家公司具体由谁拥有非常有趣。但是,要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了燕麦科技的两个警告信号(其中一个不容忽视!),在此之前你应该了解这些信息再进行投资。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发