Institutional Investors in City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO) Lost 6.7% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Institutional Investors in City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO) Lost 6.7% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in City Holding implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构在City Holding的 substantial 持股意味着它们对公司股价有重要影响。
- 前十大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
- 高管近期的卖出行为
If you want to know who really controls City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正掌控了City Holding Company (纳斯达克:CHCO),那么你必须查看其股东登记的构成。机构持有73%的股份,在公司中拥有最大份额。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.7% last week. Still, the 12% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
在投资中亏损是所有股东都不喜欢的事情,尤其是那些上周其持股价值下降了6.7%的机构投资者。尽管如此,12%的年度收益可能在一定程度上缓解了他们的整体损失。但他们可能会对未来的亏损保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of City Holding, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨一下City Holding的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About City Holding?
机构持股告诉我们关于City Holding的哪些信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in City Holding. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see City Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所见,机构投资者在City Holding中拥有相当可观的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界有一定的可信度。然而,最好还是对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓确认保持谨慎。他们有时也会出错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,通常会存在它们在‘拥挤交易’中的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个参与者可能会争相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险通常更高。您可以在下面看到City Holding的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是还有更多的内容。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. City Holding is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.5% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。City Holding并不被对冲基金持有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是贝莱德(BlackRock, Inc.),持有15%的流通股份。先锋集团(Vanguard Group, Inc.)是第二大股东,拥有12%的普通股,而道富银行全球顾问(State Street Global Advisors, Inc.)持有约4.5%的公司股票。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了一些深入研究,发现十大股东约占股东名册的51%,这意味着除了大股东,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
虽然研究一家公司机构的所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的看法也同样重要,以了解市场的动态。很多分析师关注这只股票,因此查看他们的预测也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of City Holding
City Holding的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in City Holding Company. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$42m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告,内部人士确实拥有City Holding公司的股票。 这是一个相当大的公司,因此看到某种潜在的有意义的对齐通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有大约4200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内部人士对齐的问题,您可以点击这里查看内部人士是买入还是卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众——包括散户投资者——持有公司25%的股份,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然这种规模的持股可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with City Holding (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant) .
我发现了解谁具体拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是为了真正获得洞察,我们也需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该了解我们发现的关于City Holding的两个警告信号(其中一个有点不愉快)。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。