Despite Lower Earnings Than Five Years Ago, Innoviva (NASDAQ:INVA) Investors Are up 25% Since Then
Despite Lower Earnings Than Five Years Ago, Innoviva (NASDAQ:INVA) Investors Are up 25% Since Then
When you buy and hold a stock for the long term, you definitely want it to provide a positive return. But more than that, you probably want to see it rise more than the market average. Unfortunately for shareholders, while the Innoviva, Inc. (NASDAQ:INVA) share price is up 25% in the last five years, that's less than the market return. Over the last twelve months the stock price has risen a very respectable 12%.
当你长期买入并持有一只股票时,你肯定希望它能够提供正收益。但更重要的是,你可能希望看到它的涨幅超过市场平均水平。遗憾的是,对于股东来说,虽然Innoviva, Inc.(纳斯达克:INVA)的股价在过去五年上涨了25%,但这低于市场收益。在过去的十二个月中,股票价格上涨了非常可观的12%。
Although Innoviva has shed US$58m from its market cap this week, let's take a look at its longer term fundamental trends and see if they've driven returns.
尽管Innoviva本周市值减少了5800万美元,但我们来看看其长期基本面趋势,看看这些趋势是否推动了收益。
While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
尽管有效市场假说仍然被一些人教授,但已经证明市场是一种反应过度的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性。通过比较每股收益(EPS)和股价变化,我们可以感受到投资者对公司的态度在一段时间内是如何变化的。
During five years of share price growth, Innoviva actually saw its EPS drop 23% per year.
在五年的股价增长中,Innoviva的每股收益实际上年均下降了23%。
Since the EPS are down strongly, it seems highly unlikely market participants are looking at EPS to value the company. The falling EPS doesn't correlate with the climbing share price, so it's worth taking a look at other metrics.
由于每股收益大幅下跌,市场参与者似乎不太可能通过每股收益来评估公司。每股收益的下跌与每股价格的上涨没有关联,因此值得关注其他指标。
We are not particularly impressed by the annual compound revenue growth of 1.8% over five years. So why is the share price up? It's not immediately obvious to us, but a closer look at the company's progress over time might yield answers.
我们对五年来1.8%的年复合营业收入增长并没有特别印象。那么,为什么股价会上涨呢?这对我们来说不是立刻显而易见的,但更仔细地审视公司的进展可能会揭示答案。
The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).
以下图像显示了公司的营业收入和盈利(随时间变化)(单击以查看准确的数字)。
It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Innoviva
值得注意的是,首席执行官的薪酬低于类似规模公司的中位数。时刻关注首席执行官的薪酬是有必要的,但更重要的问题是公司是否会在多年内增长收益。这份免费的报告展示了分析师的预测,应该能帮助你对Innoviva形成看法。
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
Innoviva shareholders are up 12% for the year. But that return falls short of the market. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it's actually better than the average return of 4% over half a decade This suggests the company might be improving over time. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Innoviva is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...
Innoviva的股东今年上涨了12%。但这个回报低于市场水平。值得欣慰的是,这仍然是一个收益,实际上比过去五年的平均回报4%要好。这表明公司可能在逐渐改善。虽然考虑市场条件对股价的不同影响是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。即便如此,要注意的是,在我们的投资分析中,Innoviva显示出两个警告信号,其中一个令人担忧。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.
如果你更倾向于查看其他公司——一个财务状况可能更优的公司——那么不要错过这个免费的公司列表,它们已经证明能够实现盈利增长。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文中引用的市场回报反映了当前在美国交易所上市股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。