Institutional Investors May Overlook Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ORRF) Recent US$51m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ORRF) Recent US$51m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
关键见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Orrstown Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Orrstown Financial Services的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 前 25 名股东拥有公司 46% 的股份
- 内部人士最近的销售额
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (NASDAQ:ORRF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 46% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了奥尔斯敦金融服务公司(纳斯达克股票代码:ORRF),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为46%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.7% last week. Still, the 31% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投资亏损是任何股东都不喜欢的事情,更不用说上周持股价值下降6.7%的机构投资者了。尽管如此,31%的年度涨幅可能有助于减轻他们的总体亏损。但是他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Orrstown Financial Services.
在下图中,我们放大了Orrstown Financial Services的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Orrstown Financial Services?
关于奥尔斯敦金融服务,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据接近当地市场的指数来衡量其表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
We can see that Orrstown Financial Services does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Orrstown Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,Orrstown Financial Services确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看奥尔斯敦金融服务过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
It would appear that 9.3% of Orrstown Financial Services shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Fourthstone LLC is the largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. With 7.7% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
看来奥尔斯敦金融服务公司9.3%的股票由对冲基金控制。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和活跃。许多人正在寻找推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。我们的数据显示,Fourthstone LLC是最大股东,已发行股份的9.3%。贝莱德公司和先锋集团公司分别拥有7.7%和5.1%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解公众舆论也是有意义的。有合理数量的分析师报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Orrstown Financial Services
奥尔斯敦金融服务的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且确实因司法管辖区而异。我们的数据反映了个别内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$33m worth of stock in the US$745m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.的股份。内部人士以自己的名义拥有这家价值7.45亿美元的公司价值3300万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Orrstown Financial Services. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有40%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对奥尔斯敦金融服务有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Orrstown Financial Services better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Orrstown Financial Services (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解奥尔斯敦金融服务,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了 Orrstown Financial Services 的 4 个警告信号(1 个不容忽视!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。