CS Disco, Inc.'s (NYSE:LAW) Market Cap Dropped US$56m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 51% Were Hit as Were Institutions
CS Disco, Inc.'s (NYSE:LAW) Market Cap Dropped US$56m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 51% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Key Insights
关键洞察
- The considerable ownership by private equity firms in CS Disco indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 私募股权公司在CS Disco中的显著持有表明,他们在管理和业务策略上 collectively 具有更大的发言权。
- 共有4名投资者在公司中拥有51%的控股权
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of CS Disco, Inc. (NYSE:LAW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is private equity firms. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着CS Disco, Inc.(纽交所:LAW),了解公司的所有权结构是至关重要的。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占51%,是私募股权公司。换句话说,该群体通过对公司的投资可以获得最多的收益(或承受最多的损失)。
While institutions who own 27% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$353m last week,private equity firms took the most losses.
尽管拥有27%的机构在市值上周跌至35300万美元后承压,但股权投资公司遭受的损失最大。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CS Disco.
在下图中,我们聚焦于CS Disco的不同持有群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CS Disco?
机构持股告诉我们关于CS Disco的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that CS Disco does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CS Disco, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到CS Disco确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司相当一部分的股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看CS Disco过去的营业收入轨迹是值得的(如下)。当然,还需要考虑其他因素。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in CS Disco. The company's largest shareholder is Deer Management Company, LLC, with ownership of 14%. LiveOak Ventures is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and The Stephens Group, LLC holds about 13% of the company stock.
对冲基金在CS Disco的股份不多。公司的最大股东是Deer Management Company, LLC,拥有14%的股份。LiveOak Ventures是第二大股东,拥有14%的普通股,而The Stephens Group, LLC持有大约13%的公司股票。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步查看后,我们发现前四大股东拥有51%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中有重要发言权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of CS Disco
CS Disco的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of CS Disco, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$353m, and insiders have US$36m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,CS Disco, Inc.的内部人士持有合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为35300万美元,内部人士名下的股份价值3600万美元。我们认为这显示了与股东的对齐,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人士可能是公司的创始人。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出股票。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in CS Disco. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有CS Disco 12%的股份。虽然这部分人不能决定公司事务,但他们确实可以对公司的运行产生真正的影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 51% stake in CS Disco. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股权投资公司在CS Disco持有51%的股份。这表明他们在关键政策决策中可能具有影响力。有时我们会看到股权投资公司长期持有,但一般来说,他们的投资期限较短,如名称所示,他们也并不太投资于上市公司。经过一段时间,他们可能会考虑出售并在其他地方重新部署资本。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for CS Disco that you should be aware of before investing here.
我发现查看公司具体的拥有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞见,我们还需考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现CS Disco有两个警示信号,投资前你应该了解这些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。