Private Companies Among Shui On Land Limited's (HKG:272) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 6.9% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Shui On Land Limited's (HKG:272) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 6.9% Price Drop
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significant control over Shui On Land by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 对瑞安房地产的重大控制权被私营公司掌握,这意味着公众有更多的权力影响管理和治理相关决策。
- 前两大股东持有该业务的56%。
- 公司的过往表现以及所有权数据有助于强烈判断业务的前景
Every investor in Shui On Land Limited (HKG:272) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投资瑞安房地产有限公司(香港股票代码:272)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,私营公司在公司中拥有56%的控股权。换句话说,该集团在其对公司的投资中将获得最大利益(或遭受最大损失)。
And following last week's 6.9% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.
在上周股价下降6.9%之后,私营公司遭受了最大的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shui On Land.
在下面的图表中,我们深度分析了瑞安房地产的不同股权结构。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shui On Land?
机构股权告诉我们关于瑞安房地产什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shui On Land. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shui On Land, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在瑞安房地产中占有相当的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股票价格大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,查看瑞安房地产过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住,还要考虑其他因素。
Shui On Land is not owned by hedge funds. Shui On Investment Company Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 21% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
瑞安房地产不被对冲基金拥有。瑞安投资有限公司目前是该公司的最大股东,持有34%的流通股。作为对比,第二大股东持有约21%的流通股,第三大股东的持股比例为1.8%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两大股东在公司中拥有大多数股权,这意味着他们有足够的权力影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
尽管研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也同样重要,以了解市场的动向。据我们了解,似乎没有分析师覆盖该公司,因此它可能在雷达之下。
Insider Ownership Of Shui On Land
瑞安房地产的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然对内部人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层运行业务,但CEO会向董事会报告,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shui On Land Limited in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It has a market capitalization of just HK$5.4b, and the board has only HK$1.9m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们的数据显示,内部人士在瑞安房地产有限公司名下的持股不到1%。然而,我们注意到,内部人士可能通过私人公司或其他企业结构拥有间接利益。它的市值仅为54亿港元,董事会名下仅持有190万港元的股票。许多人更倾向于看到有更大股份的董事会。下一步的良好选择可能是查看一下这份关于内部买入和卖出的免费摘要。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in Shui On Land. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众股东通常是个人投资者,在瑞安房地产中拥有38%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能主导决策,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 56%, of the Shui On Land stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
私人公司似乎持有瑞安房地产56%的股票。单从这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查一下这些私人公司的所有者。有时内部人士或其他相关方通过一家独立的私人公司对一家上市公司的股份有兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Shui On Land you should know about.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。比如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们发现了瑞安房地产的两个警告信号,你应该知道。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您也可能会在其他地方找到一个绝佳的投资。请查看这个免费的有趣公司名单。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。