Suzhou Kematek, Inc. (SZSE:301611) CEO Xianbing Liu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 7.8% Reduction in Holdings Value
Suzhou Kematek, Inc. (SZSE:301611) CEO Xianbing Liu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 7.8% Reduction in Holdings Value
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Suzhou Kematek's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 61% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 内部人士似乎对苏州科美达的增长有既得利益,因为他们的持股比例可观
- 61%的业务由前两个股东持有。
- 公司的过往表现以及所有权数据有助于强烈判断业务的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Suzhou Kematek, Inc. (SZSE:301611), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 63% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解真实控制苏州科美达股份有限公司(SZSE:301611)的人,重要的是要理解该业务的所有权结构。个人内部人士持有63%的股份,是公司最大股东。换句话说,该集团从对公司的投资中可能获得最大收益(或遭受最大损失)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥2.2b.
结果是,内部人整体承受了最高的损失,因为市值下降了22亿人民币。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Suzhou Kematek, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解一下苏州科迈特的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Suzhou Kematek?
机构所有权告诉我们关于苏州科迈特什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
Institutions have a very small stake in Suzhou Kematek. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
机构在苏州科迈特的持股非常少。这表明该公司受到一些基金的关注,但目前在专业投资者中并不特别受欢迎。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移而改善,我们可能会在未来看到更多的机构买家。当多家机构投资者想要买入股票时,我们经常会看到股价上涨。过去的营业收入轨迹(如下所示)可能是未来增长的一个指示,但没有任何保证。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Suzhou Kematek. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Xianbing Liu with 44% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 3.7% of the stock.
我们注意到对苏州开美的对冲基金没有意义的投资。根据我们的数据,最大股东是CEO刘显兵,持有44%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约17%和3.7%的股票。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两大股东在公司中拥有大多数股权,这意味着他们有足够的权力影响公司的决策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师情绪也可以实现这一点。虽然有一些分析师的研究覆盖,但公司的覆盖范围可能不广。因此,未来可能会获得更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Suzhou Kematek
苏州开美的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。公司管理层负责业务的运行,但CEO需要对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Suzhou Kematek, Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥16b stake in this CN¥26b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.
看起来内部人士拥有超过苏州凯玛特公司一半的股份。这给了他们很大的权力。这意味着内部人士在这个市值260亿的业务中有着非常重要的160亿人民币的股份。大多数人都会很高兴看到董事会与他们共同投资。你可能想了解他们是否有在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Suzhou Kematek. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众(主要是个人投资者)持有26%的股份,对苏州凯玛特有一定程度的影响力。虽然这种股份的大小可能不足以让他们在政策决定中施加影响,但他们仍然可以对公司的政策产生集体的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 5.1%, of the Suzhou Kematek stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起来,私营公司拥有苏州科美泰5.1%的股票。私营公司可能与相关方有关。有时,内部人士通过持有私营公司的股份,而不是以个人身份参与,对上市公司产生兴趣。虽然很难得出广泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Suzhou Kematek better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Suzhou Kematek that you should be aware of.
考虑一下拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但是,为了更好地理解苏州科美泰,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如,我们已识别出苏州科美泰的两个警示信号,您应该关注这些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。