share_log

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

铿腾电子(纳斯达克:CDNS)似乎使用债务相对谨慎。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/20 18:51

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

传奇基金经理李录(查理·芒格支持的人)曾说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久性的资本损失。” 当你研究一家公司有多风险时,自然会考虑其资产负债表,因为债务往往在企业倒闭时涉及到。 重要的是,铿腾电子公司(纳斯达克:CDNS)确实带有债务。 但更重要的问题是:这些债务带来了多大的风险?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时会变得危险?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

当一家企业无法轻松履行债务和其他负债时,这些负债就会变得风险高,可能是因为自有自由现金流不足或者无法以有吸引力的价格筹集资本。资本主义的一部分是“创造性毁灭”的过程,失败的企业会被其银行家毫不留情地清算。然而,更常见(但仍然痛苦)的情况是它不得不以低价筹集新的股本,从而永久性稀释股东权益。当然,很多公司使用债务来资助增长,而没有任何负面后果。在考虑一家企业使用多少债务时,首先要查看它的现金与债务的结合情况。

How Much Debt Does Cadence Design Systems Carry?

铿腾电子公司背负了多少债务?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Cadence Design Systems had US$2.83b of debt, an increase on US$648.8m, over one year. However, it does have US$2.94b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of US$116.1m.

您可以点击下面的图形查看历史数据,但它显示截至2024年9月,铿腾电子的债务为28.3亿美元,比64880万美元增加了一年。 然而,它确实有29.4亿美元的现金来抵消这部分,使净现金为11610万美元。

big
NasdaqGS:CDNS Debt to Equity History December 20th 2024
纳斯达克GS:CDNS债务与股权历史 2024年12月20日

How Strong Is Cadence Design Systems' Balance Sheet?

铿腾电子的资产负债表有多强?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Cadence Design Systems had liabilities of US$1.67b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.93b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$2.94b as well as receivables valued at US$612.3m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.05b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

从最新的资产负债表可以看出,铿腾电子的负债为16.7亿美元,需在一年内到期,还有29.3亿美元的负债需要更长时间偿还。抵消这些义务,它拥有29.4亿美元的现金,以及价值61230万美元的应收账款,需在12个月内收回。因此,它的负债总额比现金和短期应收账款多出10.5亿美元。

This state of affairs indicates that Cadence Design Systems' balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So it's very unlikely that the US$82.6b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, Cadence Design Systems boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

这种情况表明,铿腾电子的资产负债表看起来相当稳固,因为它的总负债几乎等于其流动资产。因此,这家市值826亿美元的公司短期内资金紧张的可能性很小,但仍然值得关注资产负债表。尽管负债显著,铿腾电子的净现金状况良好,因此可以公平地说它没有沉重的债务负担!

And we also note warmly that Cadence Design Systems grew its EBIT by 11% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Cadence Design Systems's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

我们还要温暖地指出,铿腾电子去年EBIT增长了11%,使得其债务负担更易于处理。分析债务时,资产负债表显然是重点关注的领域。但未来的收益,尤其是收入,将判断铿腾电子在未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的看法,你可能会发现这份分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. Cadence Design Systems may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the last three years, Cadence Design Systems recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 94% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.

但我们的最终考量同样重要,因为公司无法用纸面利润偿还债务;它需要冷硬的现金。铿腾电子可能在资产负债表上拥有净现金,但观察企业如何将息税前利润(EBIT)转化为自由现金流仍然很有趣,因为这将影响其对债务的需求以及管理债务的能力。在过去三年中,铿腾电子记录的自由现金流占EBIT的94%,这比我们通常期待的要强劲。这使得它在偿还债务方面处于非常强劲的地位。

Summing Up

总结

We could understand if investors are concerned about Cadence Design Systems's liabilities, but we can be reassured by the fact it has has net cash of US$116.1m. And it impressed us with free cash flow of US$952m, being 94% of its EBIT. So is Cadence Design Systems's debt a risk? It doesn't seem so to us. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Cadence Design Systems, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

我们可以理解投资者对铿腾电子的负债感到担忧,但我们可以放心的是,它的净现金为11610万美元。并且它的自由现金流达到了95200万美元,占其EBIT的94%。那么,铿腾电子的债务是风险吗?在我们看来似乎不是。随着时间的推移,股票价格往往会跟随每股收益,因此如果你对铿腾电子感兴趣,可以点击这里查看其每股收益历史的互动图表。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

无论最终结果如何,有时候更容易关注那些根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费获取一份净债务为零的成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发