share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That TreeHouse Foods (NYSE:THS) Is Using Debt In A Risky Way

These 4 Measures Indicate That TreeHouse Foods (NYSE:THS) Is Using Debt In A Risky Way

这四项指标表明,树屋食品(纽交所:THS)正以风险较高的方式使用债务。
Simply Wall St ·  12/20 06:11

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (NYSE:THS) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously 说过,‘波动性远非风险的同义词。’当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢关注其债务的使用,因为债务过重可能导致破产。我们可以看到,树屋食品公司(纽交所:THS)确实在其业务中使用了债务。但真正的问题是,这种债务是否使公司变得有风险。

When Is Debt A Problem?

何时债务成为问题?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般来说,债务只有在公司无法轻易偿还时才会成为真正的问题,无论是通过融资还是通过公司自己的现金流。 资本主义的一个组成部分是‘创造性毁灭’,失败的企业会被银行毫不留情地清算。 然而,更常见(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是公司必须以抄底价格发行股票,永久稀释股东权益,仅仅是为了稳固其资产负债表。 当然,不少公司利用债务来资助增长,没有任何负面后果。 在考虑企业使用多少债务时,首先要看其现金与债务的配合情况。

How Much Debt Does TreeHouse Foods Carry?

树屋食品公司的债务有多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that TreeHouse Foods had debt of US$1.41b at the end of September 2024, a reduction from US$1.55b over a year. However, it does have US$107.9m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$1.30b.

下面的图片可以点击查看更详细的信息,显示树屋食品截至2024年9月底的债务为14.1亿美元,较去年减少了15.5亿美元。然而,它有10790万美元的现金抵消这部分债务,导致净债务约为13亿美元。

big
NYSE:THS Debt to Equity History December 20th 2024
纽交所:THS债务与权益历史 2024年12月20日

A Look At TreeHouse Foods' Liabilities

观察树屋食品的负债

According to the last reported balance sheet, TreeHouse Foods had liabilities of US$716.2m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.70b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$107.9m in cash and US$224.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$2.08b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根据最后报告的资产负债表,树屋食品的负债为71620万美元,在12个月内到期,超过12个月到期的负债为17亿美元。相抵的是,它在现金方面有10790万美元,以及到期的应收账款22470万美元。因此,它的负债总额比现金和短期应收账款的总和多出20.8亿美元。

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$1.70b, we think shareholders really should watch TreeHouse Foods's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

鉴于这一赤字实际上高于公司17亿美元的市值,我们认为股东们真的应该关注树屋食品的债务水平,就像父母第一次看着孩子骑自行车一样。在公司必须迅速清理其资产负债表的情况下,股东们似乎将遭受大量稀释。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了评估一家公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务与息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比率,以及息税前利润(EBIT)与利息费用的比率(即利息覆盖率)。通过这种方式,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量和所支付的利率。

While we wouldn't worry about TreeHouse Foods's net debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.2, we think its super-low interest cover of 1.8 times is a sign of high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. More concerning, TreeHouse Foods saw its EBIT drop by 2.5% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues the company will face an uphill battle to pay off its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine TreeHouse Foods's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

虽然我们不担心树屋食品的净债务与EBITDA比率为4.2,但我们认为其超低的利息保障倍数为1.8倍是高杠杆的迹象。因此,股东们可能应该意识到,利息支出似乎最近严重影响了业务。更令人担忧的是,树屋食品在过去十二个月内的EBIT下降了2.5%。如果这种盈利趋势持续下去,公司将面临还清债务的艰难挑战。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个明显的起点。但未来的收益,胜过其他任何因素,将判断树屋食品维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你关注未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师的盈利预测。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, TreeHouse Foods saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

最后,虽然税务机关可能喜欢会计利润,但贷方只接受冷硬的现金。因此,我们显然需要查看EBIT是否导致了相应的自由现金流。在过去三年中,树屋食品的自由现金流总额出现了大幅负值。虽然这可能是由于增长支出造成的,但这确实使得债务风险更大。

Our View

我们的观点

To be frank both TreeHouse Foods's interest cover and its track record of converting EBIT to free cash flow make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like TreeHouse Foods has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. Given the risks around TreeHouse Foods's use of debt, the sensible thing to do is to check if insiders have been unloading the stock.

坦率地说,树屋食品的利息覆盖率和将EBIT转化为自由现金流的记录让我们对其债务水平感到相当不安。 但至少它的EBIT增长率还不错。 考虑到上述所有因素,树屋食品似乎债务过高。 虽然一些投资者喜欢这种风险投资,但这显然不是我们的风格。 鉴于树屋食品使用债务的风险,明智的做法是检查内部人士是否正在抛售股票。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有兴趣投资那些能够在没有债务负担的情况下增长利润的业务,请查看这个自由名单,其中列出了在资产负债表上有净现金的成长型企业。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发