share_log

Here's What To Make Of Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) Decelerating Rates Of Return

Here's What To Make Of Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) Decelerating Rates Of Return

以下是对电子艺界(纳斯达克:EA)收益率减缓的解读
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/20 10:58

What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.

我们应该关注哪些早期趋势,以识别那些长期内可能增值的股票?一种常见的方法是寻找资本回报率(ROCE)不断增加的公司,同时伴随资本投入的增长。如果你看到这种情况,通常意味着这是一家具有良好商业模式和充足盈利再投资机会的公司。因此,当我们查看电子艺电(纳斯达克:EA)及其ROCE趋势时,并不是特别激动。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

资本回报率(ROCE):它是什么?

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Electronic Arts:

对于那些不清楚ROCE是什么的人来说,它衡量的是公司从其投入资本中可以产生的税前利润。分析师使用以下公式来计算电子艺电的ROCE:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)

0.15 = US$1.5b ÷ (US$13b - US$2.8b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

0.15 = 15亿 ÷ (130亿 - 28亿) (基于截至2024年9月的过去12个月数据)。

Therefore, Electronic Arts has an ROCE of 15%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 10% generated by the Entertainment industry.

因此,电子艺电的ROCE为15%。单独来看,这是一项标准的回报,但比娱乐行业产生的10%要好得多。

big
NasdaqGS:EA Return on Capital Employed December 20th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EA 资本回报率 2024年12月20日

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Electronic Arts compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Electronic Arts .

上面您可以看到电子艺术公司当前的资本回报率与其过去的资本回报率的比较,但从过去您只能了解到有限的信息。如果您有兴趣,可以在我们为电子艺术公司提供的免费分析师报告中查看分析师的预测。

How Are Returns Trending?

回报率的趋势如何?

There hasn't been much to report for Electronic Arts' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Electronic Arts in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.

电子艺术公司的回报和所用资本的情况没有太多值得汇报的,因为这两个指标在过去五年里一直保持稳定。当我们观察一个成熟且稳定且没有再投资其收益的业务时,这种情况并不罕见,因为它可能已经过了商业周期的那个阶段。因此,除非我们看到电子艺术公司的资本回报率和额外投资方面发生实质性变化,否则我们不会对它成为一个多倍收益的公司抱有期待。

In Conclusion...

结论...

In a nutshell, Electronic Arts has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. And investors may be recognizing these trends since the stock has only returned a total of 40% to shareholders over the last five years. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options.

简而言之,电子艺术公司在过去五年里以相同的资本获得相同的回报。投资者可能已经意识到这些趋势,因为在过去五年中,股票仅给股东带来了40%的总回报。因此,如果您在寻找多倍收益的投资,我们建议您看看其他的选择。

If you're still interested in Electronic Arts it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for EA to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.

如果您仍然对电子艺术公司感兴趣,查看我们免费的电子艺术内在价值估算是值得的,以了解其在其他方面是否以吸引人的价格交易。

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

如果您想寻找具有良好收益的稳健公司,可以查看这份拥有良好资产负债表和令人印象深刻的股本回报率的免费公司列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发