ASMPT Limited's (HKG:522) HK$1.3b Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 3.4% Returns
ASMPT Limited's (HKG:522) HK$1.3b Market Value Fall May Be Overlooked by Institutional Investors After a Year of 3.4% Returns
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ASMPT's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 由于机构在股票上的大额持股,ASMPT的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前四大股东持有52%的股份。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。
Every investor in ASMPT Limited (HKG:522) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位ASMPt有限公司(HKG:522)的投资者都应了解最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有59%股份的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获益最多(如果市场下跌,则损失最多)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.9% last week. Still, the 3.4% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
投资亏损是所有股东都不愿意面对的,尤其是那些上周其持有的股份价值下跌了3.9%的机构投资者。尽管如此,3.4%的年度收益可能帮助他们减轻了整体损失。不过,我们认为他们将会留意未来的弱点。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ASMPT, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地探讨ASMPt的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ASMPT?
机构持股告诉我们关于ASMPT的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
ASMPT already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ASMPT, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
ASMPt已经在股份登记中有机构投资者。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作分析师已经研究过该股票,并且他们对此持积极态度。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能判断错误。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图出售某只股票,股票价格大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,查看ASMPt过去的盈利轨迹(如下)是值得的。当然,也要考虑其他因素。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ASMPT. ASM International NV is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. Fidelity International Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 17% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.3% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们一起可能会强烈影响董事会决策。我们注意到对ASMPT的对冲基金没有显著投资。ASM International NV目前是最大的股东,拥有25%的流通股份。Fidelity International Ltd是第二大股东,拥有17%的普通股,而Capital Research and Management Company持有约5.3%的公司股票。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察,我们发现前四大股东拥有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中有重要发言权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of ASMPT
ASMPT的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of ASMPT Limited in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$36m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人士在ASMPT有限公司名下持有不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士持有价值3600万港元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。看到至少一些内部人士持股总是好的,但可能值得查看这些内部人士是否曾卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众——包括散户投资者——在公司中拥有16%的股份,因此无法轻易被忽视。虽然这样的持股规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以在公司政策上产生集体影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
It appears to us that public companies own 25% of ASMPT. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们认为,公众公司拥有ASMPT 25%的股份。我们不能确定,但这很可能是一个战略性股份。这些业务可能类似,或者一起合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - ASMPT has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司不同群体的重要性是非常值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,承担风险 - ASMPT 有 1 个警示信号,我们认为你应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。