With 78% Ownership in Axogen, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXGN), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 78% Ownership in Axogen, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXGN), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Axogen implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在AxoGen的重大持股意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响。
- 共有10位投资者在公司中拥有52%的控股权。
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
Every investor in Axogen, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXGN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 78% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位AxoGen, Inc.(纳斯达克:AXGN)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。持有公司最多股份的群体,准确来说,约占78%,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的潜在上行(或下行风险)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$65m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 123% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
在公司上周市值增加6500万美元后,机构投资者的前景变得更加乐观。目前一年的投资回报率为123%,上周的涨幅无疑是受欢迎的。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Axogen.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于AxoGen的不同股权结构。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Axogen?
机构持股对AxoGen意味着什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Axogen. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Axogen's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在AxoGen中拥有相当的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师对该股票进行了研究,并且他们看好它。但是就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看AxoGen的盈利历史是非常值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 6.8% of Axogen shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is First Light Asset Management, LLC with 9.9% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.8% and 6.8% of the stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。看起来有6.8%的AxoGen股票被对冲基金控制。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可能会相当活跃并采取激进措施。许多人寻找中期催化剂,以推动股价上涨。根据我们的数据,最大股东是First Light 资产管理公司,持有9.9%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大的股东分别持有大约7.8%和6.8%的股票。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步检查发现,公司超过一半的股份由前10大股东持有,这表明大股东的利益在一定程度上被小股东所平衡。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构的持股是一种很好的方式,可以评估和筛选股票的预期表现。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,您可以很容易地查找预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Axogen
AxoGen的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终被算作内部人。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,特别是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Axogen, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$32m worth of the US$654m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
股东们可能会对了解到内幕人士拥有AxoGen, Inc.的股份感兴趣。作为个人,内幕人士共同拥有3200万美元的股份,占公司65400万美元的总价值。看到内幕人士进行一定的投资是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内幕人士是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Axogen. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在AxoGen中持有11%的股份。虽然这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Axogen has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
尽管考虑拥有一家公司不同群体是值得注意的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例——AxoGen有1个我们认为您应该注意的警告信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。