We Think FLEX LNG (NYSE:FLNG) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think FLEX LNG (NYSE:FLNG) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously表示:'波动性远非风险的同义词。' 当我们考虑一家公司有多大风险时,我们总是喜欢查看其债务的使用情况,因为债务负担过重可能导致毁灭。 重要的是,FLEX LNG Ltd. (纽交所:FLNG) 确实有债务。 但这笔债务对股东来说是个问题吗?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务带来风险?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
债务是帮助企业成长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还其债权人,那么它就只能任人摆布。 在最坏的情况下,如果公司无法支付其债权人,它可能会破产。然而,更常见(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司只为控制债务而必须以低廉的股价稀释股东。 然而,通过替代稀释,债务对于那些需要资本以高回报率投资于增长的企业来说,可以是极好的工具。 在我们审查债务水平时,首先考虑现金和债务水平。
What Is FLEX LNG's Debt?
FLEX LNG的债务是多少?
As you can see below, FLEX LNG had US$800.5m of debt at September 2024, down from US$916.2m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$289.5m, its net debt is less, at about US$511.0m.
如您所见,FLEX LNG在2024年9月的债务为80050万美元,低于一年前的91620万美元。 然而,由于它有28950万美元的现金储备,其净债务更少,约为51100万美元。
How Healthy Is FLEX LNG's Balance Sheet?
FLEX LNG的资产负债表健康状况如何?
The latest balance sheet data shows that FLEX LNG had liabilities of US$150.1m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.58b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$289.5m as well as receivables valued at US$28.1m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.41b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,FLEX LNG在一年内有15010万美元的负债,而在此之后则有15.8亿美元的负债。抵消这些义务后,它有现金28950万美元以及在12个月内到期的应收账款价值为2810万美元。因此,它的负债总额比现金和短期应收款加起来多出14.1亿美元。
Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$1.14b, we think shareholders really should watch FLEX LNG's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.
鉴于这一赤字实际上高于公司11.4亿美元的市场资本化,我们认为股东确实应该关注FLEX LNG的债务水平,就像家长第一次看着自己的孩子骑自行车一样。在这种情况下,如果公司不得不快速清理其资产负债表,似乎股东将遭受严重稀释。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我们通过查看公司的净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比例来衡量公司相对于其收益能力的债务负担,以及计算其息税前利润(EBIT)覆盖利息支出的能力(利息覆盖率)。因此,我们在考虑收益时同时考虑了折旧与摊销费用及不考虑这些费用的情况。
Even though FLEX LNG's debt is only 1.9, its interest cover is really very low at 1.8. This does have us wondering if the company pays high interest because it is considered risky. In any case, it's safe to say the company has meaningful debt. Sadly, FLEX LNG's EBIT actually dropped 6.7% in the last year. If earnings continue on that decline then managing that debt will be difficult like delivering hot soup on a unicycle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine FLEX LNG's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
尽管FLEX LNG的债务仅为1.9,但其利息覆盖率非常低,仅为1.8。这让我们怀疑公司是否因为被认为风险较高而支付高利息。无论如何,可以肯定的是,这家公司有相当的债务。可悲的是,FLEX LNG的EBIT在去年实际上下降了6.7%。如果收益继续下降,那么管理这些债务将像骑独轮车送热汤一样困难。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个明显的起点。但未来的收益,更多的是,将判断FLEX LNG未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的看法,你可能会发现这个关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, FLEX LNG generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 94% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.
最后,一家公司只能用现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,逻辑上的步骤是查看EBIT与实际自由现金流的匹配比例。在过去三年中,FLEX LNG的自由现金流占其EBIT的比例高达94%,超过我们的预期。这使其处于偿还债务的非常强大位置。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, FLEX LNG's level of total liabilities left us tentative about the stock, and its interest cover was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making FLEX LNG stock a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for FLEX LNG (1 is significant) you should be aware of.
乍一看,Flex LNG 的总负债水平让我们对该股票感到犹豫,且其利息覆盖率并不比一年中最繁忙夜晚的唯一一家空餐厅更具吸引力。但从积极的一面看,它将EBIT转化为自由现金流的能力是一个好兆头,这让我们更加乐观。考虑到资产负债表和所有这些因素,我们确实认为债务让 Flex LNG 的股票有些风险。这并不一定是坏事,但一般来说,我们会更愿意看到更少的杠杆。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但最终,每家公司都可能存在资产负债表之外的风险。例如,我们已确定 Flex LNG 有 3 个警示信号(其中 1 个非常重要),您应当注意。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
无论最终结果如何,有时候更容易关注那些根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费获取一份净债务为零的成长股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。